Subject:
|
Re: We're here to go
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 03:02:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
545 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, David Laswell wrote:
> Yes, you'd have to transport everything to the Moon,
Um, no, you wouldn't. Not necessarily, anyway.
> and yes, that would include launching "fuel-trucks" of some sort,
Again, no, it wouldn't. Not necessarily, anyway.
Read the rest of the thread before you start in on responding to the first post
in it, that's often a good approach in my view. Especially apropos here.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: We're here to go
|
| (...) I posted that response over 8 hours ago, when there were no second-tier responses, but I didn't get around to authorizing it until just a little while ago (compare the date-time stamps if you don't believe me, which you probably won't). I (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: We're here to go
|
| (...) Dollar cost of the total amount of fuel aside, it is more efficient. When you launch a rocket into space, it has to carry itself, its payload, its crew, and its fuel. Making a rocket that can manage that from an Earth-based launch site would (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
