| |
>
> My subsequent question about the monstrous expense of building on the Moon is
> likewise largely grounded in the physical realities of such a construction
> project. Building off-world in that fashion *would* be very expensive, whether
> Burt Rutan is at the helm or not.
I'm a big fan of space exploration. I'm an even bigger fan of universal state
funded healthcare & education.
Who in society will benifit most from a manned trip to Mars? Who in society
benifits most from a lack of universal state funded healthcare & education?
What would Bush rather we debate:
1. The merits of a trip to mars?
2. Universal state funded healthcare & education?
;)
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: We're here to go
|
| (...) If I read the original post correctly, the question was of fuel efficiency and the physical implications of a Moon-based versus an Earth-based launch toward Mars and beyond. Naturally this entails the cost of development, because fuel costs (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
