 | | Re: Need Web Page
|
|
Tried to email this privately, but Yahoo said there's no such account. (...) Check out (URL) can set up the account any way you need, and even put in your own price. We've been in business for over 4 years, and our server and support is rock solid. (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Need Web Page
|
|
try here: (URL) free upload interface is a drag, but for your $10 a month you may be able to get FTP access, not sure. -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Yahoo Sucks
|
|
(...) I disagree. I do not hate Yahoo. I admire them. Customer support costs money, and it costs a LOT of money to do well. That they can give you any at all for a free to you service, for an advertiser supported service, and still make money is (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Yahoo Sucks
|
|
Does anyone else out there hate Yahoo, especially Geocities? Their ads are relentless, customer service is non-existant, and replies to complaint and help emails are useless and written from a template! Does anyone agree/disagree with me, or am I (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Need Web Page
|
|
Does anyone know of a good web host? I need space for probably 40-50 MB of files, and I’m limited to about $10/month US. I tried the free GeoCities, but it seemed helplessly slow and even one ad seemed too many. I would prefer not to pay anything, (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :)
|
|
Subject: Re: Rechargeable Batteries From: "Lars Gjerløw Jørgensen" <lgjPURGE@jyde.dk> Newsgroups: lugnet.off-topic.geek TJ Avery's utterance expressed in news:HGFAzq.1xBp@lugnet.com: (...) What project? (...) They are available in 2000 mAh too. (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Rechargeable Batteries
|
|
TJ Avery's utterance expressed in news:HGMy45.MH7@lugnet.com: (...) woooohh I hate it!! and with popups and all.. I'll see if I can cancel the message.. thanx for pointing out :) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Rechargeable Batteries
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Lars Gjerløw Jørgensen wrote: <snip> (...) Not cool! The above link takes you to something porn related. The correct link is www.howstuffworks.com. I know, it was just a typo ;-) -TJ (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Rechargeable Batteries
|
|
(...) :-) You'll see... (...) <snip> Thanks for the information! As usual, the answer is complicated ;-) I'm actually looking at 1.2v NiMH C-cells that have a 5000 mAh rating. That should do the trick! -TJ (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Rechargeable Batteries
|
|
I'm trying to estimate the amount of power needed for a project, one that will be powered by rechargeables. Rechargeable batteries typically have two ratings: Volts and Current-Time. For example, a AA will be 1.2V and 1000 mA-h. Let's say I'll need (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | 20th Century Castles
|
|
Ran across this thanks to Kung Fool... (URL) just cool. The cutaway diagram, especially, is nifty. (21 years ago, 13-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: geek test
|
|
Hmm, only 30.57199% for me. But then there are some major geek areas I just don't get into. I don't do computer games (any more), video games, movies (much - though I have seen a small handfull multiple times), TV, and more. (...) Hmm, a married (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: High praise for Designer Set #4100
|
|
(...) I just did a little fun investigation. As an IBMer, I first think of PS2 as a computer (technically PS/2). So I did some trademark research. Here's Sony's trademark for PS2 (I'm not 100% sure this link will work for you): (URL) here's IBM's (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: geek test
|
|
(...) "Aquaman cannot marry Wonder Woman! That would be just wrong!!" (sees ICBM cruising down the street....) "Ohhhh, I've wasted my life..." KaBoooommmmm!!!! Fav. scene from the Simpsons--next to almost anything with Sideshow Bob.... Dave K (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: geek test
|
|
(...) I got 29.5858% - Total Geek I thought I was going to be the lowest. Only 14%?? Do you even watch star trek? I didn't check very much on there and I thought I got a low score. BTW I'm trying to talk like the comicbook store guy from simpsons (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: geek test
|
|
(...) I got 39.25049% - Major Geek. Not enough geekish media consumption. Steve (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: geek test
|
|
(...) Except that I scored a 40.8484% Major Geek, so I don't know if I actually out-geeked you or not. (Bruce-- for rounding? Chris++ for caring.) - Chris. (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: geek test
|
|
Quoting Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org>: (...) I noticed that! I agree, this was a nerd test - and indeed, real geeks can usually get by with Geek Code - where my true poserness shows up, except for the being a girl part, I'll still win points (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: geek test
|
|
(...) Yes. I think the methodology is you check everything that's true. (...) No, but you get style points for having it. (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
