Subject:
|
Re: geek test
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Wed, 11 Jun 2003 01:32:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
355 times
|
| |
|
|
Quoting Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org>:
> Bruce Hietbrink <bnh@chem.ucla.edu> wrote:
> > http://www.innergeek.us/geek.html
>
> 56.6075% - Extreme Geek. But I have some complaints. First, it seems to be
> a
> lot a *nerd* test, not a geek test. And I lost some points for things like
> "turn on my computer first thing in the morning", which only shows that the
> *author* of the test is not geeky enough. (Why would the computer be off?
> And if it were, why wouldn't it turn itself on?)
I noticed that! I agree, this was a nerd test - and indeed, real geeks can
usually get by with Geek Code - where my true poserness shows up, except for the
being a girl part, I'll still win points there.
;)
J
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: geek test
|
| (...) lot a *nerd* test, not a geek test. And I lost some points for things like "turn on my computer first thing in the morning", which only shows that the *author* of the test is not geeky enough. (Why would the computer be off? And if it were, (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
