Subject:
|
Re: geek test
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Tue, 10 Jun 2003 20:07:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
392 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Jennifer L. Boger wrote:
> Quoting Bruce Hietbrink <bnh@chem.ucla.edu>:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I was sent this URL:
> > http://www.innergeek.us/geek.html
> >
> > Kinda fun. I actually only ranked at 32%, which surprised me.
> >
> > Bruce
>
>
> 48.32347% - Super Geek
>
> I don't think I fibbed on this one - though, technically, I can't *find* my
> GURPS book.
Just knowing what it stands for gets you some points, though, you know. And I
didn't need mine to pass the "2 or more games, WITH expansions" tests...
Note that while Bruce rounded, you and I left our answers in their 5 decimal
digit glory... that's what seperates the wannabes from the real geeks, in my
view.
Found this test amusing enough that I added it to the web title page, I did.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: geek test
|
| (...) But as a couple of my answers were fuzzy at best I didn't think the precision of the test merited 7 significant figures. ;) I ran into a couple of issues: --My job led to a lot of my yes answers (I'm a professor of organic chemistry), so maybe (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: geek test
|
| Quoting Bruce Hietbrink <bnh@chem.ucla.edu>: (...) 48.32347% - Super Geek I don't think I fibbed on this one - though, technically, I can't *find* my GURPS book. (21 years ago, 10-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
