Subject:
|
Re: geek test
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Tue, 10 Jun 2003 23:28:47 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDMsaynotospam.ORG
|
Viewed:
|
391 times
|
| |
|
|
Bruce Hietbrink <bnh@chem.ucla.edu> wrote:
> http://www.innergeek.us/geek.html
56.6075% - Extreme Geek. But I have some complaints. First, it seems to be a
lot a *nerd* test, not a geek test. And I lost some points for things like
"turn on my computer first thing in the morning", which only shows that the
*author* of the test is not geeky enough. (Why would the computer be off?
And if it were, why wouldn't it turn itself on?)
--
Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: geek test
|
| Quoting Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org>: (...) I noticed that! I agree, this was a nerd test - and indeed, real geeks can usually get by with Geek Code - where my true poserness shows up, except for the being a girl part, I'll still win points (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | Re: geek test
|
| (...) Hello, 35.7% for me. I seems highly weighted for gaming either computer or other. I did fudge a bit on some things that I 'used' to do but don't now. I was honest though on some I thought I might know the answer to, but was not 100% sure. I (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | geek test
|
| Hey all, I was sent this URL: (URL) fun. I actually only ranked at 32%, which surprised me. Bruce (21 years ago, 10-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
