 | | Rechargeable Batteries —Thomas Avery
|
| | | I'm trying to estimate the amount of power needed for a project, one that will be powered by rechargeables. Rechargeable batteries typically have two ratings: Volts and Current-Time. For example, a AA will be 1.2V and 1000 mA-h. Let's say I'll need (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | |
| | | | | (canceled) —Lars Gjerløw Jørgensen
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Rechargeable Batteries —Thomas Avery
|
| | | | | | | (...) :-) You'll see... (...) <snip> Thanks for the information! As usual, the answer is complicated ;-) I'm actually looking at 1.2v NiMH C-cells that have a 5000 mAh rating. That should do the trick! -TJ (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Rechargeable Batteries —Thomas Avery
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Lars Gjerløw Jørgensen wrote: <snip> (...) Not cool! The above link takes you to something porn related. The correct link is www.howstuffworks.com. I know, it was just a typo ;-) -TJ (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Rechargeable Batteries —Lars Gjerløw Jørgensen
|
| | | | | | TJ Avery's utterance expressed in news:HGMy45.MH7@lugnet.com: (...) woooohh I hate it!! and with popups and all.. I'll see if I can cancel the message.. thanx for pointing out :) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :) —Lars Gjerløw Jørgensen
|
| | | | Subject: Re: Rechargeable Batteries From: "Lars Gjerløw Jørgensen" <lgjPURGE@jyde.dk> Newsgroups: lugnet.off-topic.geek TJ Avery's utterance expressed in news:HGFAzq.1xBp@lugnet.com: (...) What project? (...) They are available in 2000 mAh too. (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :) —Peter Newman
|
| | | | ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lars Gjerløw Jørgensen" <lgjPURGE@jyde.dk> To: <lugnet.off-topic.ge...ugnet.com> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:47 AM Subject: Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :) <snip> </snip> (...) drops (...) (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :) —Lars Gjerløw Jørgensen
|
| | | | | Peter Newman's utterance expressed in news:Law11-OE61ygIDd...tmail.com: (...) Yep - that is what I mean too - sorry if I wasn't clear about it :) In Denmark the old type of non-rechargeable batteries are called "brunsten" which translated gives (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :) —David Laswell
|
| | | | | | (...) Those would be known as "carbon-zinc" batteries. We tend to name our battery types based on what chemicals are used to store/provide power. I'm not sure you can even buy them in the standard letter-graded battery types anymore. Certainly not (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :) —David Laswell
|
| | | | (...) My primary reason for using them is that they're less expensive than non-rechargables in the long run, and my secondary reason is that I never have to walk out the door with half-depleted batteries. My reason for using them over Ni-Cads is the (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
