Subject:
|
Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sat, 5 Jul 2003 22:24:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
520 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Peter Newman wrote:
> NIMH, as TJ is using are chosen by people, especially digicam users for two
> reasons, firstly they do not suffer from the memory effects of NICADS if you
> don't use them nicely. Secondly unlike NICADS and to a lesser extent
> alkalines, NIMH's drop off quite suddenly hence making them very suitable
> for TJ's task and also for digicams giving you lots of usage time. Also as
> said earlier they come in higher capacities than NICADS. Hope this clears
> things up.
My primary reason for using them is that they're less expensive than
non-rechargables in the long run, and my secondary reason is that I never have
to walk out the door with half-depleted batteries. My reason for using them
over Ni-Cads is the whole memory issue, but that's only because I got sick of
batteries that only took a quarter charge. I'm not above making an emergency
purchase of alkalines to power my digital camera if my NiMHs run dry, but I try
to make sure they're all nicely topped off before/during any major travelling,
and I use an AC adapter for home use.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :)
|
| ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lars Gjerløw Jørgensen" <lgjPURGE@jyde.dk> To: <lugnet.off-topic.ge...ugnet.com> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:47 AM Subject: Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :) <snip> </snip> (...) drops (...) (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
