Subject:
|
Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sat, 21 Jun 2003 10:25:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
715 times
|
| |
|
|
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lars Gjerløw Jørgensen" <lgjPURGE@jyde.dk>
To: <lugnet.off-topic.geek@lugnet.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :)
<snip>
</snip>
> technically yes... but probably only statistically - when used in one
> special way. The energy provided by batteries often depend a lot of the
> current drawn from the battery. The trouble about rechargeables is that
> they provide the energy somewhat diffferent than alkalines. Alkalines
> provide high voltage for a period and then drops suddenly and stops
> working. Most rechargeables as well as (brownstone) regular batteries • drops
> voltage over a longer period.
This is not totally true, im not sure quite what you mean by brownstone, but
NIMH, as TJ is using are chosen by people, especially digicam users for two
reasons, firstly they do not suffer from the memory effects of NICADS if you
don't use them nicely. Secondly unlike NICADS and to a lesser extent
alkalines, NIMH's drop off quite suddenly hence making them very suitable
for TJ's task and also for digicams giving you lots of usage time. Also as
said earlier they come in higher capacities than NICADS. Hope this clears
things up.
<snip>
</snip>
HTH
Peter Newman
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :)
|
| Peter Newman's utterance expressed in news:Law11-OE61ygIDd...tmail.com: (...) Yep - that is what I mean too - sorry if I wasn't clear about it :) In Denmark the old type of non-rechargeable batteries are called "brunsten" which translated gives (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :)
|
| (...) My primary reason for using them is that they're less expensive than non-rechargables in the long run, and my secondary reason is that I never have to walk out the door with half-depleted batteries. My reason for using them over Ni-Cads is the (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :)
|
| Subject: Re: Rechargeable Batteries From: "Lars Gjerløw Jørgensen" <lgjPURGE@jyde.dk> Newsgroups: lugnet.off-topic.geek TJ Avery's utterance expressed in news:HGFAzq.1xBp@lugnet.com: (...) What project? (...) They are available in 2000 mAh too. (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
