 | | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) **snip** (...) Not as tragic, presumably, as if the aliens had landed, but that's another matter. That same guy (whose name I forget but could find easily enough if I weren't so lazy at the moment) directed City of Lost Children, another (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) If I may stray into the topic of Alien IV, I've always found it ironically amusing that the crew remarked how beautiful Earth is as they entered the atmosphere shortly after the mothership took out all of southern Africa. The crew seemed to be (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) The Sulaco was sent out on a special mission. Quite a lot of the ship was unused at the time. I typed up a big ol' blurb about it here: (URL) Lieutenant, Fleebnork Division Muffin Head (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) After hearing the premise of Alien 3, I determined that I would never, ever watch it. Still haven't. :-) Bruce (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:>I saw the first showing in a mostly empty theatre with really high-backed (...) Back in '92 a local theater showed the Alien triple-header to a mostly empty theater. It was wild to see the three (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) That's true, and a good point. For consistency's sake, I guess we could posit that the automated ships aren't sufficiently savvy to drop from orbit and land in hostile environments without some sort of ground-based guidance, but even this (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) "We're looking for a few good men and women, and we *do* mean a few." (...) Not bad, and not inconsistent with most of what we see. Would there have been sufficient gravity, then, for the alien and Ripley to fall into the airlock? That would (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) I'd always understood it (aside from the dramatic necessities of the plot line) as a logical extension of the colonial marine mentality of "be prepared". It may well be more economical in the long run to send a ship that can do 95% of what (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) That's down sizing for you. (...) Perhaps gravity genarators are very large pieces of equipment? (...) I'd say the propulsion systems WE'RE needed. (...) Perhaps the ship is multipurpose and designed to fight it's way into a heavily defended (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) The ship and crew are full of gravity throughout the movie; it's a grave situation. (I apologize.) (...) I just saw Aliens again this weekend, and I have another question. Why does a ship the size of New Jersey (or whatever its size--it's (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) Because it's too darn hard to show zero grav over a whole movie. Either that or they have a gravity field generator of some kind. Or constant acceleration or deceleration (not that the crew are positioned correctly to show this). (...) If they (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) Wouldn't you want to enjoy gravity if you were traveling in space for months at a time? (...) Perhaps Nostromo is sufficiently blunt 400 years in the future. Even wrecker drivers take pride in their rigs - and no wonder! Drivers have to pay (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Alien and gravity
|
|
I'm watching the movie "Alien". Why is there gravity on board the ship? It does not rotate to generate "artificial gravity", and there are no large planets around. Ok, so they do operate in a solar system, but they're not that close to a planet. And (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) The amusing thing on Red Hat Linux is that herbivore and omnivore are there, as are carnivorous and carnivorously, but not carnivorous. (23 years ago, 14-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) On most anything, actually. It's really not meant to be a dictionary, even though the directory looks like it. Sometimes a random word comes in handy, though. (...) None of them are found in the sloaris /usr/dict/words. :) Besides, in this age (...) (23 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) /usr/dict/words on many linux distributions is terrible. Here's an interesting test: grep herbivore /usr/dict/words grep omnivore /usr/dict/words grep carnivore /usr/dict/words (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) It was indeed a little off. I'd worked out 7.4 letters per word based on an even-ish distribution; working on the list from the linux /usr/dict/words shows an average of 8.4 letters per word (after subtracting out the ^Js) for words in nature. (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) Not sure this is a good assumption. The letters aren't evenly distributed -- for example, E is way more common than Z. The median letter is probably somewhere around K -- and you only need to get up to 'E' to be past the 1/4 mark. (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) Part of the problem was bad communication (by Nik to us). This was an enrichment assignment, not a mandatory one. And only some of the kids got it, it wasn't intended to actually be solved... (I know this now because Jo called me, it's been (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) Finally remembered the assignment: get as close as you can to 100 without going over. Only one word, but it had to at least be 90, so most kids searched around a bit until they got one close, but it didn't drag on forever. Everyone compared (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
