To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 1979
1978  |  1980
Subject: 
Re: Tactical nukes (was: Real Pics Of New Mecha)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Thu, 31 Aug 2000 20:53:39 GMT
Viewed: 
662 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, James Powell writes:
Sure.  Look at  the USMC...they _issued_ (to the div. level) 1.5kt nukes, that
were man portable.  Only one little problem...the rocket propelling the nuke
had a range of about 2km, and the radiation was lethal at about 2.5km...

LOL!  "Military intelligence" hard at work.  :-,

In Starship Troopers (and Ogre/G.E.V.) anyway, this is addressed by the
radiation suits the troops wore (as you later note).  At some point in the
book, when they need to penetrate an area "softened" by a nuclear device, it's
mentioned that no one wanted to linger very long there, even in a suit...

I wouldn't be surprised that someone is working on a defense contract to
produce a similar form of infantry armor / radiation shielding.  The current
radhaz battlefield guidelines for infantry is for them to hitch a ride on the
outside of a tank which should protect them from radiation from the ground,
but doesn't do a whole lot to protect against, for example, contaminated air-
borne dust.

@22 lbs for U235, -at normal density-, if you compress it, the weight required
goes downwards _a lot_.

I think s/weight/volume/ , right?  Wouldn't it still be 22 lbs. but very
tightly packed, or is it a lesser mass?

For the 1.5 kt warhead (W25, which was the air-air version, used on F101,
F102, F106 planes), the weight I have for the physics package is 68 kg

Dang.  Dang.  Nuclear anti-aircraft airbursts?  Dang.  BTW, is that the
smallest nuke the U.S. military procured, or do they get smaller?  A 150-lb.
grenade is kinda heavy.  :-,

Tom Clancy's "The Sum of All Fears" is another good source, even if he says in
the preface that he deliberately altered details (not so that the info
wouldn't be out there, just so someone couldn't blame him for the big bang)

Probably since several key governments have already blamed him for a missing
sub.  ;-)

Cheers,
- jsproat



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Tactical nukes (was: Real Pics Of New Mecha)
 
(...) Sure. Look at the USMC...they _issued_ (to the div. level) 1.5kt nukes, that were man portable. Only one little problem...the rocket propelling the nuke had a range of about 2km, and the radiation was lethal at about 2.5km... (...) @22 lbs (...) (24 years ago, 31-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

35 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR