Subject:
|
Re: Tactical nukes (was: Real Pics Of New Mecha)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Thu, 31 Aug 2000 18:57:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
607 times
|
| |
|
|
I can't speak for Tom in this matter, but I've heard that Spamnium is a
pretty powerful explosive source.
^__^
~M
--
Mark's Lego Creations
http://www.nwlink.com/~sandlin/lego
> From: Sproaticus <jsproat@io.com>
> An alternative that I don't see mentioned much, but have read about
> *somewhere* before, are hybrid systems containing more than one type of
> isotope; i.e. mixing a stable high-neutron source and an unstable
> low-neutron source for detonation. But I don't have a clue as to which
> materials would be considered, or even if a "stable high-neutron source" or
> an "unstable low-neutron source" even exist.
>
> Cheers,
> - jsproat
>
> --
> Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
> Is it still illegal if I copy just the FBI warning?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Tactical nukes (was: Real Pics Of New Mecha)
|
| (...) We at Sproat Labs tried working with Spamnium (including its dirivatives Spamtomium, Spamitillium, and the dreaded Twice-Baked Spamcake), but it emitted so many bogon particles that we quickly exhausted our reserves of Fruitcake shielding... (...) (24 years ago, 31-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
35 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
