 | | DNS Problems
|
|
Are we having DNS problems today? About half the URLs I go to look at are not resolving. (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
|
(...) Am I misreading the big jump in time between 11 and 12 as transatlantic traffic? LND2 does sort of evoke "London" the same way that DCA evokes "Washington DC" (Tyson's Corners??) (...) Yes and yes. (...) I have no idea what it proves about (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
|
Just as a follow up: I noticed that in Lar's traceroutes, the suck on cais.net happened after a Mae-East router. So, in the spirit of enlightened experimentation.... Here's a traceroute to lugnet.com from the Mae-East Looking Glass: Type escape (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
|
(...) Right, well, I am a network guy, so perhaps I can help to enlighten a bit... (...) Well. 100-120ms seems like a lot to me, but then, we have no idea what kind of connection you're sitting behind, and I've become accustomed to rather larger (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
|
PS, can you spot the transatlantic jump? it's pretty easy to see... In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Larry Pieniazek writes: for bricksmiths: (...) for lugnet: (...) ++Lar (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: broadband finally comes to my part of Knoxville
|
|
(...) well, only as a router between our home network and the "DSL-network". I have an external "DSL-modem" which does the actual routing, but it's connected to one interface on the firewall (486/25, 8MB ram), while the other interface is connected (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: broadband finally comes to my part of Knoxville
|
|
(...) Do you use that as your router too? Is there a ready to read guide for the not very network technical on how to set up an older/cheaper box with Linux for the express purpose of being on 24/7 (in my case it would be in the basement where my (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
|
(...) I, at this client in the UK at a time when no one else is in the office and the connection SHOULD be lightly loaded (it's all new hardware here but we go somewhere else before it goes public) don't get quite the same results Mike does... same (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | WSP Layerd Service Provider wasn't installed as the 1st LSP ?
|
|
"WSP Layerd Service Provider wasn't installed as the 1st LSP" I'm puzzled about this message, when checking the status of (non-functional)WSP-clients the system concludes with this message. Does anybody have a clue as to how to resolve this problem, (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Very cool ship
|
|
Mark Sandlin wrote in message ... (...) It's no huge deal, Mark, but ... it's mainly the fault of Outlook Express, scrolling up a (very) large list of threads to re-examine an old thread is handled very clumsily. Frankly I'd like to use the web (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Very cool ship
|
|
"Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:B64BFD42.8138%s...ink.com... (...) PC version here. (...) I say we find out if others are having a similar problem. Maybe you could test it out in off topic test. -Jon (...) This (...) Fast (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Very cool ship
|
|
Hmmm, I'm using OE 5.02 for Mac, and my post shows up as a new thread. Maybe the PC version puts it into the old thread if it has the same name? I suppose I will have to consider this next time I post a MOC. Perhaps I could put a date in the subject (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Very cool ship
|
|
(...) Actually this is strange. Mark where did you post the message? .space? This has happened before and I'm at my girlfriend's on a different comp. I am using the newest version of Outlook express (the same on my computer) According to the (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: broadband finally comes to my part of Knoxville
|
|
(...) the only thing we use (though I do like ZA) is a linux firewall, that does the NAT for us as well... (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | broadband finally comes to my part of Knoxville
|
|
Took it long enough, but as of day before yesterday I actually have ADSL. Getting pretty good speeds, probably because I'm a little more than a stone's throw from the phone company's remote DSLAM. Kinda cool browsing the web at home and having pages (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
|
(...) at a solid 1.2mb over my ADSL connection, with most websites popping up near instantly, the way they used to at the office before Napster killed our DS-3. Win98 SE IE 5.5 Colon about 4 seconds to get to the bricksmiths page encoded colon about (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Codes, Cyphers and Sequences, Oh My! (LONG)
|
|
Hi all! Fire up your decryption algorythyms and sequence degenerators, the fun's about to start... Delete this if not interested. 1) Child's Play: What's the next letter in this sequence? O,T,T,F,F,S,S,... 2) Teenagers Play: What's the next set of (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Hot Paper?
|
|
(...) Note that I think the LDEF had some paper/cardboard panels, you might try spelunking the NASA site for the writeup on what happened to them. I could be misremembering, maybe LDEF only had metal and plastic panels. But there were over 500 of (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Hot Paper?
|
|
(...) So all we need to do to solve this is build and launch a satellite made out of paper. Think of how little fuel we'd need! Dave! (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Hot Paper?
|
|
(...) Incident radiation. The paper may BE in a vacuum, but it, itself, is not a vacuum, it has density greater than 0. Hence paper is not a vacuum. Consider why some satellites spin. To keep their surface temperature within bounds, by allowing the (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
