 | | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) Just a suggestion...look at the email address it came through...The threaded ones are done on the web view at home, while the others are through email at work. (...) I'll have a look when and if I ever get time. (...) But what about SMTP [I (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Computer Problems
|
|
(...) I have virus protection? WHOOOOOOA MAN! News to me! Rick (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) Beg all you want. You can't deny responsibility. You've been told what not to do, if you persist in doing it, you're responsible. Therefore you have control. (...) No company "has little or no need to use the internet". Not if it wants to (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) How would you explain that your message just now (which I'm replying to) appears properly threaded? (...) Actually, it is. See RFC822 "Standard for the Format of ARPA Internet Text Messages" and RFC1138, RFC1148, RFC1327 and RFC2156. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Computer Problems
|
|
Is your BIOS virus protection feature enabled? Windows needs it to be disabled during setup. Selçuk (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) I beg to differ on this...I have NO control over whether messages appear threaded...The software I use is MS Outlook. From this, the message goes to a MS Exchange server. It is this that causes the problem. Unfortunately, this piece of (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Computer Problems
|
|
(...) Yes (...) Says, for distrubution for a new PC. The error i get is right after the End-User LA. There is no cause for the error, just the error and how you might fix it. I will have the 'Exact' error name and stuff when i go to work today. Rick (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) It's (at least) MS Outlook, or some variant, or the MS Exchange server that processes the mail, or something in the way some sysops configure it, or something in the way users use it, based on the quick tests I conducted. That's not to say (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) Berating? I saw no berating. I merely suggested that he ought to stop complaining about how things are done here at LUGNET until his own house is in order. Further, you see, he actually DOES have control. He can change jobs, he is working for (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) It identifies itself as: X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.####.#) in the SMTP headers, and that's about all I know. LarryP posted some more info though that might help. --Todd (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... <snipped a few lines> (...) from (...) this (...) software -- (...) disasterous. (...) Do you know what software that is causing the problem? Would be a nice thing to know, so I can avoid it. /Joakim (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Computer Problems
|
|
(...) My totally-not-knowing-...-situation guess is: the install CD is of the "upgrade only" variety. (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Computer Problems
|
|
(...) Count your blessings? *ducks, runs* (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Computer Problems
|
|
(...) What exactly happens? You need to give some more information before anyone can really help you with something like that. FUT set to .geek (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) Totally agree. It's not that it works weirdly, it's that it acts brokenly. If enough places rejected broken postings/messages, the offending software would get fixed. (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) Benjamin may not have control over what mailer his employer uses, but he certainly has control over whether or not his messages appear threaded. If he posts using software that works correctly, his messages will appear threaded. If he posts (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Broken mailers which mess up threading
|
|
(...) how about, instead of rejecting such messages, make a "soft" threading feature... and activate it only for mailers you know are broken (lke that Internet Mail Service, Eudora, etc)... Just write a little proggie that will attempt to guess what (...) (24 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Broken mailers which mess up threading
|
|
This broken thread garbage has got to stop. Example: (2 URLs) countless other examples in the .loc.au group.) The question is, how do I detect this broken mailer that Ben's using? It reports itself as: X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) (...) (24 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Hey, look what's on Freshmeat....
|
|
(...) Actually, I tried this initially, and found it much worse. It's not intuitive enough -- even after playing for quite a while, you keep forgetting which button is going to go which direction. When I get around to implementing a Settings dialog, (...) (24 years ago, 8-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
