 | | Re: Idea for automatic Lugnet Set Database linking
|
|
I don't think it would be sloppy at all. I think the benifit of being able to reference a set would vastly outweigh the cases where people are talking about their 1998 corvette. Besides, it would be a subtle reminder to stay topical. It might be a (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea for automatic Lugnet Set Database linking
|
|
(...) I was contemplating doing something similar a couple weeks ago when MikeS was talking about how much he used the search box... Rather than just giving a link into the DB, it really ought to (if it could) give a thumbnail and the set's data (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Idea for automatic Lugnet Set Database linking
|
|
I was copy pasting URL to Lugnet set database onto my email client when I realized how HANDY it would be if all LEGO set numbers are automatically shown as hotlinks to the lugnet set database! So, you'll be reading a Lugnet posting, and the author (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Fun with JAVA
|
|
(...) HTML crashing netscape....... Big Chaos manor Onion to them ;) (...) That would probably be the problem. The typical crashing java applet tends to be the home-crafted (by someone else, though) kind. Jasper (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: markup syntax for member pages
|
|
(...) Yeah, we're both hardcore computer geeks -- although he's gone back to school now to complete his graduate studies in ecology. Over the past 20 years he's taught me most of what I know about programming and design, so I try to give back what I (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for util to set IMG size in HTML
|
|
(...) Way To Do It. I've used the Image::Size module for a while now. It's a more generalized tool, using an OO interface to the image info. (It was in fact derived from wwwis.) One place it can be found: (URL) use it to automagically generate the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: markup syntax for member pages
|
|
(...) [...] (...) cool. -Tim (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: markup syntax for member pages
|
|
(...) Ahh, I see...you're thinking in actual terms of a programming language. But this is a simple text-formatting thing, not a programming language. But even in terms of programming languages: much success can be had with a preprocessor which uses (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: markup syntax for member pages
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... >In lugnet.admin.general, Chris Moseley writes: >> But regardless, please don't mix meta types. I suppose it's worth noting that I'm very unlikely to be a user of this language, because I don't virtually emote (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: markup syntax for member pages
|
|
(...) I don't quite grok. By COBOL-style comments do you mean something in column 1 affecting the rest of the line? And if so, why do you feel it is bad to mix that with paired (open/close) constructs? Take C++ for example -- it offers two types of (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
