 | | hey ms windows folks
|
|
Hey, has anyone checked out K-Meleon? How is it? (URL) (24 years ago, 24-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: I cannot connect to LDRAW.ORG - plz help!!!
|
|
Dan: (...) It is. There are 33 hops to www.ldraw.org (see below). (...) Yes, but how can you change it? (...) [...] (...) [...] (...) I did a traceroute from a machine in Copenhagen: alf$ traceroute www.ldraw.org traceroute to www.ldraw.org (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: I cannot connect to LDRAW.ORG - plz help!!!
|
|
I wonder if it's just too many hops? I can get there, takes me 29 hops... Isn't the default TTL for tcp/ip set for 30? Dan (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: I cannot connect to LDRAW.ORG - plz help!!!
|
|
(Follow-up directed to ".geek"...) OK, since I was visiting my parents tonight anyway, I decided to run this traceroute at their place over their connection, since I could *not* access LDraw.ORG from their computer *either*. :-P This is what I got: (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Digital camera or $500
|
|
(...) Actually, the school thing looks even more like a scam. Guaranteed $50-100k salary? With no pre-requisites? After a 3 week course? (Actually less, since that's assuming 3 hours a day.) They hire 99% of their own graduates? (24 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: HTML 4.0
|
|
Guito: (...) Yes of course. (...) Definitely. It isn't much work, and it is the most reliable way to get sensible results on all platforms. (...) You should definitely go for correct HTML code. - And use HTML Tidy and validator.w3.org to do some of (...) (24 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital camera or $500
|
|
(...) I'm not sure it's for real either...but it can't hurt to try :) Seems like a lot of stuff to set up for a scam, tho. Especially the whole "school" on the main page... --Bram (24 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital camera or $500
|
|
(...) anyway. (24 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital camera or $500
|
|
(...) Oh...and if you do, please drop me an email saying you did. It liked to see if they keep their word. Thanks! --Bram (24 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Digital camera or $500
|
|
Anyone interested in getting a digital camera (like myself :) might be interested in this: (URL) BramL@juno.com as the referrer please) --Bram (24 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | fonts in netscape
|
|
Hey Todd -- did you ever get your netscape font size issue fixed in Linux? I found the solution. (URL) (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: A couple of pictures of the GMLTC layout at Carlsbad
|
|
(...) ***SPAM-O-SUCKER-v0....ss-suck*** +address looks invalid +trying sed 's/nospam//g'....looks good +address stored in BigSpamEmailCollection +boy that one was easy ***SPAM-O-SUCKER-v0....omplete*** (24 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Noooooo!!!!!!
|
|
(...) Cool! I played with this last night. One thing I am really appreciative of is the fact that instead of implementing a separate form of folders or whatnot to keep track of links, this toolbar is just generated from the contents of (...) (24 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: mpeg rotation
|
|
(...) Pick up your monitor, and put it on its side? (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) And thank you for it. However in this case, it's a customer requirement that the user, in the ordinary course of events, *never see* the old page. Yes, a clever user can go schlepping around in their cache, and that's OK, but the ordinary user (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: ibm and novell?
|
|
(...) definite possibility, ibm _loves_ notes. (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: ibm and novell?
|
|
(...) it just makes me wonder if big blue only wants the directory stuff or if they want to get rid of groupwise to promote *shudder* notes... (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: ibm and novell?
|
|
(...) of the other contenders include Sun, Microsoft, AOL, and the Guy Down The Street. Personally, I think it'd be cool if Novell were bought out by TLC, but we're probably not *that* marketable yet. :-P Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) ...<smile> I think their point is that the user should be always up-to-date, even without knowing it; and without having to realize the page is outdated and reloading. At home I have the page reload every time, but here I can't control (...) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) Why should they have to do anything? Computers are supposed to make things easier. Telling people that they need to press some seemingly-arcane (to a new user) key combo isn't good user-interace design. (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | ibm and novell?
|
|
(this may only affect me but here's the info anyway) rumor's floating around that IBM may take over Novell.... (URL) was the only info i could find on it... (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) EXPIRES (...) Is its just me, or are you guys making this much too difficult? Or are you thinking your users can't handle the keystroke? Any user that can <Ctrl><Alt><Delete> to reboot can easily function with <Ctrl> and click on "Reload" Just (...) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) Why not? A simple phrase: Press <Ctrl> and click on "Reload". Why is that not viable? Why is that less viable than any of lots of other keystroke mouse combinations? No offense, but give your users some credit! (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: mpeg rotation
|
|
(...) Perhaps and VideoEditing software like Ulead Media Studio can do it? Should be an standard function in video editing software. (...) *hurgh* /Tobbe - (URL) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: multi train dogbone
|
|
(...) Yes. Much less hoop-jumping involved. The worst, of course, is Quicktime -- stupid proprietary codec. (It'd be much less of an issue if they'd produce a player for Linux, even a closed-source one. But no.) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: multi train dogbone
|
|
(...) You do mean that mpegs are easier to view than avi's right? We use mpegs for several reasons - first of all, that's what the mavica outputs :) And second, I would hate to boot to windows just to view a clip... And third, Jenn would never boot (...) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | mpeg rotation
|
|
Hey all - any idea how I can take an .mpg file, and rotate it 90 degrees? I could break the movie down to jpegs, rotate them, and re-encode them to an mpg, if only I could find how to break an mpeg down to frames, without taking screenshots of (...) (24 years ago, 13-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring to move to LUGNET Soon
|
|
(...) Oh, I use Junkbuster occasionally; it's turned off now due to some really old issues with something I can't quite remember just yet. I'm not very worried about the banners themselves; I'm more concerned with Yahoo's advertising policy than I (...) (24 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring to move to LUGNET Soon
|
|
(...) You don't have to listent to them. (URL) [ -> .off-topic.geek ] (24 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.org, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | mozilla
|
|
Whoo, a new patch for the Linux rendering system is in today's nightlies, causing it to (finally) be as fast as Communicator in most situations. (And faster in others -- resizing deeply nested tables, for example.) (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) Right, but telling your viewers to do that every time isn't a very viable option. (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) I'm not sure what you mean by cookies being set twice. The two functions above are used for non-logged in state and logged-in state respectively. Every page access while logged in causes the cookie to be set (notice they are not (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) BTW, the reason I *had* to figure out how to do this is because after uploading a file, the server spits out a javascript redirect (this.replace ...) to the folder url the uploaded to. If that page was cached, the user would see the cached (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) EXPIRES (...) Just a clarification, my example was for direct writing of HTTP headers, as you must do in a CGI. I suppose those tags would work as META HTTP-EQUIV tags in a web page, but I'm not sure if all proxy caches look at http-equivs, (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) That's a keystroke, right? A process runs to generate these pages quite frequently. We want the user to see the most freshly generated page without the user having to take any action of their own. So we want to put tags into the page to tell (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) <Ctrl> reload works for me. (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) Wicked excellent. I'm going to try that. So the cookie rationale there is to avoid having cookies accidentally set twice, yes? In case one of the caching entities isn't smart enough to automatically not cache pages containing set-cookie (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) I read somewhere that not all proxy caches will observe this. Actually I think it said they only look at the actual headers, not HTTP-EQUIV. It doesn't hurt to cover all bases. See my other post for details. KL (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) Here's what I do to guarantee no caching: void printCGIheader(){ printf("Content-type: text/html\n"); printf("Expires: 0\n"); printf("Cache-control: no-cache\n"); printf("Pragma: no-cache\n"); printf("\n"); } void printCookieHeader(char (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
