To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / *190 (-20)
  Re: Digital Photography
 
(...) Hrmmm.... do you mean digital video? Dunno about that, but digital still cameras surpassed 640x480 a LONG time ago. (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Digital Photography
 
(...) Wow -- I wonder if their technology 18 years ago was up to par with the digital video cameras on the market today? Knowing the tricks Sony can pull, I suspect it probably was. Anyone know the story on higher-res (> 640x480x24bit) digital (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Jeeves
 
(...) which LEGO website is the best! (...) someone who has the same name as you. Steve (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Jeeves
 
I just ran across this while sniffing around the Yahoo message boards to see what rumors were extant about my old company... (1) (URL) this query: (URL) found a few new things and some stale links. Ed Boxer gets a mention! For egoboo I tried this (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Traffic icon and link
 
(...) OK, there's now a little honeycomb-dots icon thingy for the top bar -- it says "Traffic" beneath the icon, and it takes you to the /news/traffic/ page. It automatigically appears at the top of any of the newer pages in the system (that is, (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Text::Query
 
(...) No, it's using a homebrew. I probably should look into Text::Query though, if it's loaded with callbacks and/or easy member-function overloading. What I threw together isn't very smart about word roots, and it isn't very fast either. But it (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Tan color again?
 
(...) Well, whatever the case, I just used that module for a CGI script at work. I *really* like it. Espcially, in that you can construct query strings approaching the usefulness of boolean algebra, but with a less wordy syntax. I noticed (1) that (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: True Geekness
 
(...) Well, one reason is that that /news/groups/ page is obsolescent, but as soon as some meaningful icon for the traffic/activity page comes to mind, then it'll probably appear in a whole bunch of places. --Todd (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Web Site Announcement and HTML question.
 
I have been working on redesigning my Web page (again I know) with a better tool. Everything looks good and seems to work great except for one thing. I have a Menu at the top of my page that has Hypertext links to sections of my homepage. These (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Tasty!
 
(...) Because if it were green, you wouldn't know when to stop mowing your lawn. (...) Everyone knows the moon is made of cheese, Gromit. (...) Heh. Someone told me about "Dante II: Damnation Bugaloo" where the Tootsie-Pop Owl, whilst suffering in (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Fun with JAVA
 
(...) Hmmm... C++ uses generally the same syntax, and it can reference the Java API... That *must* mean... nah. The things that make Java Java, are not available in Javascript. These things include but aren't limited to: object-oriented (1) (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Fun with JAVA
 
(...) That's interesting. I've had many things crash Netscape for me -- Quicktime 3.0, Shockwave, HTML, etc. -- but never Java. Do you visit particularly bad applets? Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: What is "powerful"?
 
(...) Boot up time issues aren't unique to Windows. I was always annoyed at how long OS/2 took to boot up at work. Now that I use AIX on an RS/6000, Windows and OS/2 start up instantly by comparison, though a large part of the slowness of AIX (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Fun with JAVA
 
Sproaticus wrote in message <376FD969.C35EB4B5@g...es.com>... (...) It uses generally the same syntax, and on netscape, it can reference the java api (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Fun with JAVA
 
Jasper Janssen wrote in message <377cbc95.9819689@lu...et.com>... (...) That reminds me, I once heard it was possible for javascript to file out a filename in the file area of the form(maybe with C:\windows\cookies) (In a hidden window , of (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Perl rules!
 
(...) It's no toy. (...) It's not a good language to teach Computer Science with. BTW, there is arguably never any "right" way. Just different ways to do things that either work correctly or don't work correctly -- or perform correctly but (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Fun with JAVA
 
(...) Java crashes Nutscrape. Javascript doesn't. (...) In my client, all it can do is open a mailto: window, or send an email with the contents of a form _after_ you click a button, IIRC. (...) Except crashing the computer. Jasper (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: X-Face: usage?
 
(...) Hehe. It's kinda cool to have it as an option, yes, but you should be ab;le to turn it off ;) Jasper (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Perl rules!
 
(...) The problem with perl, I am told, is that it's also incredibly easy to do things exactly the wrong way. In fact, it's vastly easier than to do it the right way. Just like in any other language, of course, but in perl, "there is always more (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Good image-format converters
 
(...) I use ThumbsPlus, which is my personal favorite image managing package. Worth every penny. (URL) is good too, and I have used that before. Both do batch processing. (25 years ago, 27-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR