 | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) i've heard good things about clemson (no details, just sits in my mind as a good thing) (...) our problem is that the 3000 that are already in the enterprise network are splitting up into different groups (yikes, ever split a tree in 4? ew) (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) yah, that fits my experience with their install - you say that the 6.2 isn't any better? I havn't tried it yet... (...) nod - I ran into that trying to upgrade 6.0 to 6.1 in place, and failing misrably... ended up going a full install. (yay (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) Hrmmm.... I'm sitting in on the directory services committee in my organization (utk.edu) and we just heard the eDirectory show from Novell today. They're supposed to be setting up a conference call between us and people at Clemson. Maybe we (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) ha ha :P earth days... hey man, we had a IBM Model 95 running netware 3.2 (don't ask, legacy sucks) that was up for over 500 earth days... but y2k finished that one for us (actually, we unplugged it from the network at midnight, since we had (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) 100s of Mercury days or 100s of Earth days? --Todd (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) barring the groupwise servers, our main file servers (9 of them that users "touch") have been upgraded in place, and for some reason... they didn't like it. when DS is requested to be opened, it takes like 3.5 mins (weird) we haven't had time (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) I think that they have in fact removed a few things from the 6.1 installl disk (it's a pretty tight squeeze), but it shouldn't have been anything remotely mainstream. In my (humble, of course) opinion, the 6.1/6.2 installer is terribly broken. (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) jazz) (...) That's strange. Servers on our internal network were extremely long-lived in the 4.x days, even with 10000's of objects in the tree. (Well, the non-Groupwise servers, anyway.) What conditions do you think lead to your servers going (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) soon to be netware 5. we're upgrading. All our servers are at 4.2 (or 4.11, same thing, different support packs) we're busy trying to merge the current enterprise of 3000 (with groupwise and zenworks/winstall/NAL and all that jazz) into a (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) hey now, sometimes they live longer than a week... we have one that's been up 100s of days... (it's one we don't do much to) :) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) I'm willing to bet that she's admin over a NetWare 5 site. NetWare 4 was far more stable. I sometimes wonder why we even let 5.0 out the door (not that I had any control over that!) Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) not sure yet (only tried it today, after burning a CD at work), and the first thing I get asked after the bootloader is "please insert your driver disk". It doesn't matter which mode I choose (graphical, text, or expert), it doesn't say what (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) Curious -- why won't 6.1 install? (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) shop (...) yah, she has 3000 users, I have 200 - she has to reboot her servers at least once a week (if they don't crash before that) while my servers average uptime of about 200 days, at heavy load... and that's only cause then I take them (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) heheh. that's almost the exact situation we have here. 486/25 running RH6.0 (6.1 won't install, didn't have time to get it to yet), compared to PIII/500 running win95... I can't say the linux is faster, at least not in X :P At work, however, (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) heh, we have enough holy wars at home... I'm a novell admin at a enterprise shop (gwu.edu) and he's a linux admin at a small shop (giccs.georgetown.edu) it's pretty weird.. but we try not to fight about it :) We do have a lot of people try and (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) Heehee -- all he needs is a 486 for Linux. :) Linux on a 25 MHz. 80486 will blow the socks off a 700 MHz. Pentium III running Win95. :) (j/k) --Todd (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Redhat 6.1 up and running, Vmware 2.0 installed
|
|
(...) They've finally hooked up drag&drop for bookmarks -- that was the main blocker for me. But it still doesn't have SSL, so you need to keep something around for that for now at least. (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Redhat 6.1 up and running, Vmware 2.0 installed
|
|
(...) I've been thinking about trying some other browser (sorry netscape, cronning killall netscape every night is getting annoying). Are the snapshots good enough for reasonable use? :) Dan (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Redhat 6.1 up and running, Vmware 2.0 installed
|
|
(...) Just Wait For Mozilla. No, really, I mean it. I've been using the nightly builds for a while now, and it's getting really good. (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
