 | | Re: A Lego personal ad?
|
|
(...) LOL - those are all valid points! If I didn't have such high standards though, I would have offered a Galidor set or maybe 50 Timmy minifigs!! - Bob (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A Lego personal ad?
|
|
(...) Too bad I'm a hetero SWM; I wouldn't mind getting the Destroyer you mention. :) ...I've thought about running an ad of my own to find a SWF AFOL, but then that could lead to arguements about whose mini-figs are whose and which of us gets to (...) (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | A Lego personal ad?
|
|
SWM Looking for SWF, NS, ND, who is passionate about Lego. Will trade one MISB Imperial Star Destroyer for one (1) date - please respond to PO Box CG47, Arizona, USA. Serious inquiries only! - Bob ;-) (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Not quite "fun" but weird
|
|
(...) Now that's the kind of ambiguity of phrase you want to avoid... I'm sure the SO would be none too happy if anyone were to get the impression you were talking about *her* rather than Lydia! Maggie C. (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Not quite "fun" but weird
|
|
(...) I have never read a Crichton book so I can't opine, but the only movies based on his work I have ever even liked were "The Andromeda Strain" and "The Great Train Robbery". The latter is just fun -- if only more movies were like that; most (...) (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Not quite "fun" but weird
|
|
(URL) ironic thing is that the only way I'll ever read another Crichton book is if someone ties *me* down. Hmm... Dave! (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: The first smiley?
|
|
There was a bit here (URL) here (URL) Stacey ---...--- www.minifig.co.uk #925 - I'm a citizen of Legoland travelling Incommunicado "Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:sandlin-7DEC1E....net.com... (...) story (...) (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: The first smiley?
|
|
(...) used in an advertisement as long ago as the 60s. I'll see if I can find it. (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Jocular self-deprecation (Re: Those stupid conservative (was liberal) judges are at it again!)
|
|
(...) Weirdly, the web view truncated this topic to just "Jocular self-deprecation judges are at it again!)" in the top five list on the right. Can that be fixed? It made me smile but other truncation may cause confusion. (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | The first smiley?
|
|
Possibly apocryphal, possibly not really the first but an interesting story of computer archeaology nontheless: (URL) got the URL from an old IBMers mailing list I am on) I don't think it has anything to do with MS other than that's where the story (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Good Salsa
|
|
(...) The correct answer is C, both of the above ;-) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Good Salsa
|
|
(...) Do you put the tequila in the salsa and mix, or put the salsa and tequila in you, and mix? Steve (22 years ago, 21-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Punk!
|
|
(...) Dunno about the Dead Kennedys, but I've seen Jello Biaffra on his own and he's worth catching. James (22 years ago, 21-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Punk!
|
|
(...) Yikes! So now the Dead Kennedys are THE washed-up, has-been rockers that continue far past any real interest in them. Who knew? Now they join the ranks of Pink Floyd, The Stones, The Who, etc. I wouldn't waste my time seeing any of these old (...) (22 years ago, 21-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Punk!
|
|
(...) Social D ! I've always liked their stuff, but I confess to prefering the slightly pop-ier alternative selections from them... -H. (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Punk!
|
|
(...) Must listen to them as well. (...) Know them both - I have all the Greenday albums, but frankly I'm losing a bit of the interest I had in them... :-/ (...) Yup! :-) (I did post in .mediawatch about the clip when I saw it...) (...) Someone has (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Punk!
|
|
(...) :-P I just *knew* there was a punk inside you!... Pedro (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Punk!
|
|
(...) Done, like'em both. (...) DISlike them both. (Dead Kennedys performed here some weeks ago, BTW) (...) The ones I did not signal, either I don't know them, or know them but have no oppinion about them so far. Thank you for the tips. I shall (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Punk!
|
|
(...) Good "classic punk selection"! Don't forget Social Distortion (one of my favs) Bad Religion Green Day and of course, the new White Stripes! (Complete with LEGO MTV Video!) And another one of my favorites is 999...although it has been (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Punk!
|
|
(...) Yeah, I guess it was -- but that's misspelled, right? -- Hop-Frog (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
