Subject:
|
Re: Evidence of Warm Blooded Dinosaurs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Apr 2000 16:55:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
248 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
>
>
> Jeff Stembel wrote:
>
> > Anyone interested in Dinosaurs should check this out:
> >
> > <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A53547-2000Apr20.html>
> >
> > Pretty cool, huh? :)
>
> I saw that! It sort of confirms what palaeontologists have thought since
> about 1980. The fact that it's a plant-eater is more interesting,
> though--the suggestion existed that "only predators needed that level of
> energy." Hm.
>
> best
>
> LFB
A similiar article appeared in the L.A. Times. One would suspect that
warm-bloodedness goes back at least till the dinosaur-mammal split given the
plant-eater angle.
Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Evidence of Warm Blooded Dinosaurs
|
| (...) This prompted me to pull out one of my dinosaur books, and examine the dinosaur family tree. :) Anyway, if this chart is correct (it's ten years old, but I doubt its changed much), then I'd guess Dinosaurs and mammals both evolved (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Evidence of Warm Blooded Dinosaurs
|
| (...) I saw that! It sort of confirms what palaeontologists have thought since about 1980. The fact that it's a plant-eater is more interesting, though--the suggestion existed that "only predators needed that level of energy." Hm. best LFB (24 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
