 | | Re: Favorite Lego Train?
|
|
(...) I learned on an HP-2000 (1977-78). ;-) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: SPAM
|
|
Yes, but I attribute it to my activity on eBay, not LUGNET. Look at this lame attempt: ___...___ Subject: Re:%20The%20sunshine...use%203119 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 12:14:13 EST From: Nsname1962@aol.com To: johnneal@uswest.net everyone is talking about (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | SPAM
|
|
Allright could it be more off-topic? I mean, to send something *NOT* funny to lugnet.off-topic.fun... Anyway, this latest week, I have recieved about ten spam-mails a day, compared to the normal amount of two or three a week. Could this have (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Favorite Lego Train?
|
|
(...) Hmm, somehow I think this HP 2100 is a little more powerfull and usefull than the HP 2100 I learned to program on... (that HP 2100 was essentially a PDP-8 clone). This post just jumped out of the Lugnet summary listings and begged to be (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Legoholic
|
|
(...) time. (...) I came out of my dark ages back in the summer of 98 and started a buying frenzy that Fall that lasted into early January '99. I built a pretty impressive Pirate collection from scratch, and picked up a few Town sets. Then the (...) (25 years ago, 7-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: What are you going to do with all those half price 8448's?
|
|
(...) No, didn't you see the attribution? It was on the PR Newswire! It's a real product. I use it at least two times a week. (seriously, yes, I made it up...) (25 years ago, 7-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: What are you going to do with all those half price 8448's?
|
|
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:389B2D55.F1AA03...ger.net... (...) when I (...) again. (...) ROFL. Did you make that one up? Huw (25 years ago, 7-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO-Direct
|
|
In article <389CF082.A2BFABE9@v...ager.net>, lar@voyager.net says... (...) In other words, it's for Gag Purposes Only (TM) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Legoholic
|
|
BLASPHEMER! BLASPHEMER! <ripping garments> BAN THE DAN, BAN THE DAN!! ;^D John "D. Jezek" wrote: Too much of anything is not good, even Lego. (25 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Does your train layout move?
|
|
(...) Hands down, your offer sounds more inviting than Jeff "the Daumer" Stembel's! {;^D -John "thread mixer" Neal (...) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Does your train layout move?
|
|
John Neal wrote in message <389D2F54.20DCCF8E@u...st.net>... (...) the (...) be (...) Pretty funny! Feel free to stop by the next time you are in the neighborhood! Mike - mike_walsh@mindspring.com (URL) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Legoholic
|
|
(...) I've experienced the same problem as you. In the second half of '99 I've spent about 99% of my free time doing lego-related activities like building, sorting, looking at catalogs, reading lugnet, buying on eBay, going to TRU, etc. It was the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Does your train layout move?
|
|
(...) Not ever having been to your house, I'd say no...;-) -John (...) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Digimon, Monster Rancher, Pokemon????
|
|
(...) Well, the way in which they work is that Digimon is actually supposed to be a male version of the Tamagotchi (you remember that don't you?) It was another virtual pet but you'd train them and by connecting two ujnits together you could fight (...) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Mistaken ID
|
|
(...) To zing, one must: - be funny - clearly insult the subject of the zing. Fair child, that post to pun failed on both counts. Large Scale Integration of the content did not show me any humor and Micron level scanning didn't help me see if you (...) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: ------( Welcome to lugnet.build.minifigs )------
|
|
(...) Well, go out on a limb and head on over there, then. Dis member ain't going to, though. (25 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Fun with Sacajewea [kind of long]
|
|
(...) Technically, you CAN, but it's against CTA rules and not all that safe when you are dragging a rollaway and your computer. Besides, I like freaking out the CTAers, and since everyone else does the between the cars thing, I get to be different. (25 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO-Direct
|
|
(...) Well, not a misteak, certainly, because I don't make them. This is a bit of a running gag. Whenever I claim not to make misteaks, I do so by spelling misteak in a way that some people (who don't know better) would claim is incorrect. But by (...) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: ------( Welcome to lugnet.build.minifigs )------
|
|
(...) Whoops! Mistook you for J Johnston. Sorry! <snip> -Shiri (URL) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: ------( Welcome to lugnet.build.minifigs )------
|
|
(...) Why? I live in Maryland, the best state on Earth (even better than insanity)! ;) (...) LOL! :) Jeff (25 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
