To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 4248
4247  |  4249
Subject: 
The radius of a D&D fireball (Was: Rush: "Lego is a Tool for 4 year olds")
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Tue, 1 Feb 2000 22:40:32 GMT
Reply-To: 
jsproat@io.(nospam)com
Viewed: 
855 times
  
Frank Filz wrote:
Another interesting one I self taught myself was multiple integration. I
had come up with this idea to come up with a formula to calculate the
actual radius of a D&D fireball when it went off in a closed area. It
was obvious to me that I needed to work with volumes, and I knew
integration of a curve gave you an area, so I set out to figure out how
to get a volume, and decided I needed to integrate twice. So I proved to
myself that I could get the volume of a sphere by integrating the
equation for a circle twice, and then set on my way. When we got to
multiple integration in calculus a few months later, I said, "oh, that's
what it's called." and went to sleep.

LOL

I got into the most heated (pun intended) argument with a DM once because
someone lit a fireball in a long and skinny hallway; the people past the
"radius" of the fireball were still damaged.  Unfortunately, I was arguing for
what the DM Guide said; I didn't want my character to burn and asphyxiate!
Can you guess who lit the fireball?  :-,

Cheers,
- jsproat

--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
The glass is half empty, rapidly evaporating,
  and breeding bacteria which will chew your skin off.
   - BLOOP



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The radius of a D&D fireball (Was: Rush: "Lego is a Tool for 4 year olds")
 
(...) Must have been the first edition DMs Guide. I'm pretty sure the 2nd Edition guide told you to expand the fireball to the full 33000 cubic feet. Regards, Steve Hodge (25 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Rush: "Lego is a Tool for 4 year olds"
 
(...) To me there are two issues. The first is do we take people into college who are not necessarily the most likely to succeed. The second issue is how do you assure someone is most likely to succeed. Since I believe it is impossible to come up (...) (25 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

89 Messages in This Thread:


































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR