Subject:
|
Re: Rush: "Lego is a Tool for 4 year olds"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Feb 2000 22:48:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
813 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kevin Loch writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Rich Manzo writes:
> > a Lego robot is not the solution. That just harms the more academically
> > intellgent people.
>
> What exactly is an "academically intelligent" person?
What I ment by "academicallly intelligent" person was somebody who excels in
the traditional areas of academics, reading, writing, history etc. Not someone
who can make the best duplicate of a Lego robot.
-Rich
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Rush: "Lego is a Tool for 4 year olds"
|
| (...) And a "academically intelligent" person is always the best person to solve a problem? This is the thing, the collages have to look outside the box (outside the top 5-10-33% of students _by marks_ or _by SAT_ or by any other method that is (...) (25 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Rush: "Lego is a Tool for 4 year olds"
|
| (...) What exactly is an "academically intelligent" person? Is that a person that just knows how to get good grades? I remember many excellent students that were not so intelligent. Especially in High School, where there was a much more direct (...) (25 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
89 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
