To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 4119
4118  |  4120
Subject: 
Re: Rush: "Lego is a Tool for 4 year olds"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 1 Feb 2000 23:12:10 GMT
Viewed: 
851 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Rich Manzo writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kevin Loch writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Rich Manzo writes:
a Lego robot is not the solution. That just harms the more academically
intellgent people.

What exactly is an "academically intelligent" person?

What I ment by "academicallly intelligent" person was somebody who excels in
the traditional areas of academics, reading, writing, history etc. Not someone
who can make the best duplicate of a Lego robot.


And a "academically intelligent" person is always the best person to solve a
problem?

This is the thing, the collages have to look outside the box (outside the top
5-10-33% of students _by marks_ or _by SAT_ or by any other method that is
solely reliant on "academic inteligence", because the best person to fill a
spot may _not_ be the person who scores 90% on every test, but it may be the
person who scores 60% on every test, and keeps at it.

We are eliminating a large pool of talent, and I think that it is a crying
shame.  I also feel that (esp. in the US, but here in Canada too...)
the almighty $ is starting to drive a large portion of people away from
education, when they should be getting it.

James Powell



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Rush: "Lego is a Tool for 4 year olds"
 
(...) someone (...) What I was stating in the initial message was that a Lego robot test would harm the acadamically intelligent student. And it would. As have stated before that does not mean that I am content with the current system. I admit that (...) (25 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Rush: "Lego is a Tool for 4 year olds"
 
(...) What I ment by "academicallly intelligent" person was somebody who excels in the traditional areas of academics, reading, writing, history etc. Not someone who can make the best duplicate of a Lego robot. -Rich (25 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

89 Messages in This Thread:


































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR