 | | Re: malicious behavior —Allister McLaren
|
| | | (...) Who said I didn't expect it? (...) Show me where I asked for a 'bye'. If I've breached the TOS, I'll take my lumps. I don't consider anything that's happened here a 'malicious' provocation. 'Mischievous' at worst. And your repeated claims that (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) I think what Dave is driving at is that even though your actions may technically be with the TOS, it is a question of civility. Pushing people's hot buttons and watching the fireworks isn't what LUGNET is about. Lugnet is about laughing with (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX) !!
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —Allister McLaren
|
| | | | | | | (...) I'm not sure why you're bringing Jlug into the discussion here. If I could set the fut to lugnet.org.jlug right now, I would. But now that you have, I say you're arguing from ignorance. There's a far greater sense of camraderie there than I've (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Only because it is the only other forum which I know you use, that's all. Really. (...) It wasn't my intention to insinuate that. I was making a comparison based on tone. Style. Manner. That sort of thing. (...) My only point is that a JLUG (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —Allister McLaren
|
| | | | | | | | (...) :sigh: (URL) and (URL) (...) Are you saying he's being accidentally mischievous? (...) No, you probably can't. (...) You chose to butt in with the adversarial stuff. I figured you liked it that way. :shrug: (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Why the sigh? It says JLUG is not for children and there are no rules. Fine. Now this part I don't get: "The JLUG is a group of Lego enthusiast that are not geographically centred but certainly work together through online communication. After (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —Allister McLaren
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Before my time. Ross is the man to ask about that. I don't particularly care. (...) I never said it was. 'Shenanigans' is just a turn of phrase. He seems quite sincere, and verbose. (...) Me too. And sometimes (not every time as some seem to (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) <snip> (...) <snip> Verbose? Who, me?? Dave K -no one around here but us scarecrows... (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) See, Al, at the end of the day, you're just a plain jerk. JOHN (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) I prefer to think of Al as a jerk with the lot. ROSCO (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | (...) You'd know. JOHN (17 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | (...) LOL, and again you take "I think" and change it to an assertion of knowledge. ROSCO (17 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: indignant behavior —Allister McLaren
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Tut tut, John. That's bordering on incivility. Think of the children reading this. (17 years ago, 26-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) In fact it wasn't all online. (...) It wasn't. And the FAQ doesn't say it was. It says "it started making sense to have a group that could participate online". I see no "need" in that excerpt at all. Just as there was no "need" for the (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —C. L. GunningCook
|
| | | | | | | | (...) You are wrong. I think I would know, since I wrote that, and I was the one joking around. The whole thing started as a joke in real life, because I am geographically challenged from other "local" groups. You know, friends joking... real people (...) (17 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) It's not shocking, just unclear. Not that it really matters, but these friends with whom you joked-- they aren't AFOLs I assume, because presumabley they are the ones with whom you are geographically challenged. Perhaps you joked with (...) (17 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —C. L. GunningCook
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Snipped (...) No, they are AFOLs. Just because I am geographically challenged to them, doesnt mean I didnt actually make the drive (numerous times). Snipped more... (...) Indeed. (...) Exactly (*grins*). Janey "Delusional, Red Brick" (17 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —Chris Magno
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal wrote: snip (...) snip (...) FIREWORKS!!! i LOVE fireworks!!! its what I DO !!!! Chris www.thepyroguys.com 1. then what is the number one thing lugnet is about? (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Special deals for lawyers, too! I love it:-) lol (...) And the number one thing LUGNET is about is.... (at least, me) Camaraderie. But hey, I'm into pyro, too! (URL) (I'm in some of those pics!) JOHN (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) I'm not saying it's an injustice that requires severe punishment. It's your perspective that you need to work on. The facts-- Person A, in a position of authority, changed links on the Technic sidebar. The *only* links that were changed were (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —Marc Nelson Jr.
|
| | | | | (snip everybody) Here's the thing, Dave: you're totally right. But there's no point in worrying about it any more. There seems to be a consensus that it's OK to bully Eric on LUGNET. I've (URL) protested it before>, but apparently the admins and the (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Standing up! Was... Re: malicious behavior —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | Moving this back to o.t.d. for debatable reasions... (...) As a somewhat parenthetical point to what Marc said above (though flowing right from his poat)-- At what point should people 'stand up' against (maybe perceived) transgressions? I mean, (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) <spits pop all over screen> I hope this is an example of that Canadian humour you were talking about! The Libby trial makes this kerfuffle seem like world war! :-) JOHN (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) Kinda sad, really... ended in a whimper instead of a bang... Eh, I have no idea what the results will be. After all the data I've read, it's pretty convoluted--who said what to whom and when... And, as I'm told around here, in the grande (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Say, you're not in the press corps, are you? ;-) Ah, the good, old days of Watergate... (...) Exactly. (...) To Plame? Only that she can get rich off of a book/TV movie deal. Bottom line-- much ado about nothing. JOHN (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
