Subject:
|
Re: malicious behavior
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:59:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
10059 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal wrote:
| |
Now this part I don’t get:
“The JLUG is a group of Lego enthusiast that are not geographically centred
but certainly work together through online communication. After joking around
for awhile it started making sense to have a group that could participate
online. Especially for those unable to attend regular Lug meetings due to
distance or other factors or for those that just can’t seem to join enough
LUGs.”
I assume this joking around was ONLINE already, so I don’t quite understand
why another forum was needed (unless it was a different TYPE of forum, one
where smack was encouraged, no holds barred; that type of thing)
Correct me if I’m wrong.
|
Before my time. Ross is the man to ask about that. I don’t particularly care.
| |
| |
| |
| |
I’m not saying he shouldn’t, but he’s made his point, and is now merely
repeating it ad nauseum. But I see that sort of shenanigans is perfectly
ok with you. Isn’t it great that Lugnet’s big enough for such a diverse
community?
|
I don’t see his posts as intentionally mischievous at all. But then, I
think I’ve gotten to “know” Dave over the years to know if they were.
|
Are you saying he’s being accidentally mischievous?
|
No. You seem to think he’s being intentionally mischievous. I don’t see
them as an example of mischief at all.
|
I never said it was. ‘Shenanigans’ is just a turn of phrase. He seems quite
sincere, and verbose.
| |
For instance, I read the manner in which e posts, and
all I can do is shake my head. All I come up with is koo-koo over cocoa
puffs.
|
Me too. And sometimes (not every time as some seem to think) I respond with wry
humour and sarcasm.
| |
| |
| |
That’s how it comes off to me, anyway.
But I was wrong about your last intent. We seem to only relate under
adversarial circumstances. Pity.
|
You chose to butt in with the adversarial stuff. I figured you liked it that
way. :shrug:
|
Adversarial is the wrong word (on my part). I “butt in” to let you know that
Dave wasn’t being intentionally mischievous as you suggested. You’ve got
that wrong. My intentions are always to clarify and understand, not engage
in debate for its own sake.
|
Yep. Pretty clear
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Why the sigh? It says JLUG is not for children and there are no rules. Fine. Now this part I don't get: "The JLUG is a group of Lego enthusiast that are not geographically centred but certainly work together through online communication. After (...) (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
183 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
