Subject:
|
Re: malicious behavior
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Feb 2007 22:25:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9616 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal wrote:
| |
Now this part I don’t get:
“The JLUG is a group of Lego enthusiast that are not geographically centred
but certainly work together through online communication. After joking around
for awhile it started making sense to have a group that could participate
online. Especially for those unable to attend regular Lug meetings due to
distance or other factors or for those that just can’t seem to join enough
LUGs.”
I assume this joking around was ONLINE already,
|
In fact it wasn’t all online.
| |
so I don’t quite understand
why another forum was needed
|
It wasn’t. And the FAQ doesn’t say it was. It says “it started making sense to
have a group that could participate online”. I see no “need” in that excerpt at
all. Just as there was no “need” for the creation of Lugnet way back when.
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Why the sigh? It says JLUG is not for children and there are no rules. Fine. Now this part I don't get: "The JLUG is a group of Lego enthusiast that are not geographically centred but certainly work together through online communication. After (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
183 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
