Results 861 880 of about 1900.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
|
| half (score: 0.401) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.401) |
|
| | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
| (...) *CRASH*!!! Nobody expects the Taxonomic Scale Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise. Surprise and anal retentiveness.....oo...ooo....two chief weapons are surprise, anal retentiveness, and a ruthless devotion to splitting scales....three! (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.401) |
|
| | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
| (...) Absolutely. If the universe is cyclic, then simply everything collapsed back into as small of a point as possible until the big bang was triggered. An interesting question would be if the physical laws of the universe change from one (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.401) |
|
|
| half (score: 0.401) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.401) |
|
| | Re: Evolution vs Creationism
|
| (...) I don't think what makes a theory scientific is as hard and fast as some would like to indicate. Does it have to "helpful" to be scientific? Why would it have to? (...) Basically, Creationist Theories don't fit the known evidence. (...) (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.400) |
|
| | Re: Evolution vs Creationism
|
| (...) I cited one aspect of the Big Bang, that's all. You usually have some kind of evidence, contruct a model, and then see if you can find new evidence to confirm or deny the theory. I spoke from the standpoint of the model, not the actual linear (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.400) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.400) |
|
| | Re: Evolution vs Creationism
|
| (...) What? Of course the Big Bang theory makes predictions. Virtually any model makes predictions. You then see if observable data matches the predictions - in the case of the Big Bang, are galaxies (or more properly galactic groupings) moving away (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.400) |
|
| | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
| (...) "Micro-evolution" and "macro-evolution" are creationist terms, not terms used by scientists. That should tell you something right away. Further, in evolution, what you would call "macro-evolution" is nothing more than "micro-evolution" over a (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.400) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.400) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.400) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.400) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.400) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.400) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.400) |
|
| | Re: Liberty vs. Socialism
|
| (...) I found this article to be somewhat inaccurate. For example, it states that more than 40% of academic posts are held by women. This is far from the truth. In the Universities, the vast majority of the higher academic positions are still held (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| half (score: 0.400) |
|
| | Re: Sticking my gun where it doesn't belong...
|
| (...) As half-a-million legally owned guns are stolen in the USA each year, I'd suggest gun crime is somewhat dependent on lack of gun control legislation. ;) Ownership is one thing; ownership without responsibility is a different kettle of fish. (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| half (score: 0.400) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.399) | More: Next Page >>
|