Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 41 – 60 of about 12000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
(...) Apparently so. (...) It seems like a good idea, it seems like it might work. Because all rights are property rights and all that... Okay, so I accidentally kill my neighbour. Darn it, I say. I must make recompense for the killing. Do I (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.420)

		Re: The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)
I have decided that it makes the most sense for me to stop talking about space in the universe and just talk about land. Bear in mind that I think the argument extrapolates out to all habitable space, but for now, talking about land might be easier. (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.419)

		Re: The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)
I'm addressing three of Frank's notes here, not just the one upline from where I'm posting. As a result of my use of "good and just" coupled with the assertion that rights are merely a legal construct, Frank pointed out that we need to know the (...) (22 years ago, 23-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.417)

		Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
(...) Why would sarcasm be a reason not to take a comment seriously? (...) But it's okay simply declare that all rights are property rights and assign a dollar value for all transgressions, just because a capitalist government* happens to get into (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.415)

		Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
(...) Ahh... so we can dispense with the beaurocracy do determine the price of the crime and build a judiciary instead. Seems like a good idea. But what is this mention of a criminal penalty? How does that fit with an 'all rights are property (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.414)

		Re: Fixing the world (was Re: Ldraw cannon
<366DDFEB.DF57435D@c...OSPAM.com> <slrn76s42j.1so.cjc@...S.UTK.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) If you donate money of your own free will, to a cause that you believe is worthy, because it helps (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.393)

		Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
(...) <snipped the adultery bit> (...) Determined by a judicial process... so once again, you need a judiciary... and because your theoretical system is dynamic, values for transgressions need to be determined each and every time, so it's going to (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.389)

		Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
(...) Good points. I post on off-topic.debate irregularly, but view it often. If o-t.debate wasn't there it wouldn't worry me. However, like driving past a traffic accident, I try to ignore it - but I am constantly drawn back. The views expressed (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.388)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) I see. Well... Taking on Larry's sentence some while ago, if all rights are property rights, can't you reduce common law to law against theft, and then extend it to all conflicts of interests where one party gets harmed? (I'm not saying it is (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.386)

		Altruism is a bad idea? (was Re: Finally some church/state mingling that I can really get behind!)
(...) And here I was thinking that "all rights are property rights" was a strange belief. Adieu Richie Dulin (2 URLs) Port Brique Somewhere in the South Pacifique (2 URLs) Misérable Building a safer South Pacifique (21 years ago, 13-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.350)

		Re: Yahoo Sucks
(...) No it wouldn't. The US government, and all lesser related governments (states, counties, cities, townships, etc.) are restricted from making laws that prohibit free speech on public property. No such restrictions are made for private/corporate (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.342)

		Re: New Web Page
(...) You know, I don't get that. I've seen lots of newsgroups explode into US v. Canada or US v. UK debates, and its always so silly. Ultimately, you get a tiny little say in what goes on in your government and I get a tiny little say in mine, but (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.317)

		A summation? (was Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
<slrn7k3ois.1dt.cjc@...S.UTK.EDU> <FBy91u.K5w@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) You came late but your statement above is the crux of the debate. A lot of people do not buy this link, do (...) (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.316)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) I have a huge problem with the characterisation of my cogent and lucid statements (:-))as inane, or gibberish. Perhaps to someone who'd rather not honor property rights and doesn't understand why property rights matter, they're gibberish. But (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.314)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) I have a huge problem with this inane argument. Larry is avoiding the basic issue and circumventing it with property gibberish. It is simply this - all Doctors take a Hypocratic oath - that they will provide medical service irregardless of the (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.305)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) <snip> (...) <snip> (...) I stated this more or less to get your blood boiling. I believe people in need ought to be helped. I believe there are many people in need of health insurance in this country and that they ought to be helped by our (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.303)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) It worked. (...) Feel free to act on that belief. There are many worthy charities out there. You mentioned one of my favorites, Habitat for Humanity. We've been supporting them for an awfully long time. (...) That's where you go too far. (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.303)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) Admirable quality, I wish more humans felt this way. People should feel this way, as it is good for all. (...) Why? Because he feels the government should try to take care of the people it was created to protect and serve? I think you, (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.302)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
Whoops... first time round was just mailed to Frank, meant to post this instead, so here it is. (...) Right. that's because I'm Libertarian Macho Flashing(tm). I do it all the time. I'm not this over the top out in public, trust me. For a somewhat (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.302)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
Your little moral problems are a sucker's trap, because you haven't stated enough assumptions and preconditions, so whatever I say will be twisted around. But hey, look up sucker in the dictionary... see that picture? that's me. (...) Why? No one (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.301)

More: Next Page >>