Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 1981 – 2000 of about 12000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: An interesting find
(...) Err, I think he's referring to the stolen election being the sign that the Bill of Rights are done for (missing since inauguration day) in our country. He's wrong, of course. The Bill of Rights was trampled on way before that. I keep trying to (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
(...) everyone (...) Although I'm generally a left-wing peace supporting citizen the events of the last year here in Israel (and now the horrible unbelievable attack in NY) have convinced me that when dealing with people that have no regard for (...) (23 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		Re: Gotta love Oracle...
(...) What must a person of Turkish descent whose family has lived in Germany for three generations do to seek citizenship? (...) Actually, this is a tricky situation because ultimately I think that rights are just a notion. But I spend the majority (...) (23 years ago, 26-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		Re: someone has to say it...
(...) Can you give an example here? I think it's rather cold and callous to talk about unlimited rights to reproduce without regard to the fact that it's not practically possible to allow such rights to exist, nad that you're setting false (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		(canceled)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		(canceled)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		UK Happy to sign European Convention on Human Rights (was Britain's bloody... (was When is...)
(...) make (...) want (...) colonised, (...) So what is your answer then? NI's problem is partly that it is still living back then... in the past. (...) again? (...) Jewish (...) who (...) usurpers) (...) Even if Britain then = Israel now. Would (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		Re: Something not right about Captain Ahnee and the Dipwads?
(...) rights (...) Are you saying that it being "PC" to suggest that it's wrong for people to beat up on minorities just because they're minorities? There's a wide difference between the extreme "PC" view that one should always heap everyone with (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
(...) Like what? Am I missing a bigger trend? (...) Um...what could be more damning than video footage? What on Earth _would_ you consider reasonable evidence? I haven't heard anything inappropriate about the handling of this case from the article (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
(...) Really? Do you generally think that aiding criminals should have no penalty? There may be issues surrounding this that I haven't thought through, but on first blush, it doesn't seem like a bad general policy to me. I would certainly intervene (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
(...) Good. Chris (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
(...) I hope this was intentional understatement. If your child ends up in the hospital because of your type of punishment, your right to associate with small people should be stripped from you and you should be incarcerated in a psychiatric (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
(...) Did you feel like I was attacking you? I was kind of perplexed at your response to my response, but to see this actually worries me. I thought that we _were_ working through an issue by sharing our thoughts in a dialog. Maybe we have (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
(...) (URL) a quick test--it's not definitive, but it did peg me at the same thing the test I took in high school, college and university pegged me at (ENFP), and recently it pegged me at INFP... less the partier I gather ;) Dave K. (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
(...) Thanks for the link! I skimmed thru it now, and I'll give it a more throrough read tonite after work. I concur you shouldn't make any life-changing decisions on the basis of these types of tests. I liked them because, well, I was Extrovert, (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
(...) OK, I took this silliness. Chris' Type is INFP (44 67 33 33) I am theoretically exactly as introverted as DaveK. Chris (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
(...) It may be a good start to discuss what people think the differences between Introvert and Extrovert Intuitive and Sensing Feeling and Thinking Perceiving and Judging Though, looking at it now, it probably isn't because even these global ideas (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
(...) Would you compare the Civil Rights Movement of the 60's in the US to the Intifada today? Which group has progressed further-- Blacks or Palestinians? Why is that? Because Palestinian leaders like Arafat are not concerned with the freedom of (...) (21 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		Re: Supreme Court Rules Agains State Rights
(...) Reason this month had an interesting series of articles about the Supremes. Stuff analysing their work, and asking people to predect who MIGHT be nominated and who the person asked liked, as well as favorite past justices... fascinating stuff. (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

		Re: Supreme Court Rules Agains State Rights
(...) Civil disobedience is next, it looks like. (URL) been tried before and didn't work very well. But she has more character than those that deny they ever did it (43) or claim they didn't inhale(42). ++Lar (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.976)

More: Next Page >>