To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 26993
26992  |  26994
Subject: 
Re: Supreme Court Rules Agains State Rights
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 18:53:30 GMT
Viewed: 
1926 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/06/scotus.medical.marijuana.ap/index.html

Hmm,

Stevens said there are other legal options for patients, "but perhaps even
more important than these legal avenues is the democratic process, in
which the voices of voters allied with these respondents may one day
be heard in the halls of Congress."

But apparently democratic processes in the states aren't important...

Civil disobedience is next, it looks like.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050606/ap_on_re_us/scotus_medical_marijuana_calif;_ylt=Ah.Knwh8y.f12EMwTdGlzbCs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2M2YzbmJmBHNlYwN1cw--

That's been tried before and didn't work very well. But she has more character
than those that deny they ever did it (43) or claim they didn't inhale(42).

++Lar



Message is in Reply To:
  Supreme Court Rules Agains State Rights
 
(URL) Stevens said there are other legal options for patients, "but perhaps even (...) But apparently democratic processes in the states aren't important... Frank (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

9 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR