To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27043
27042  |  27044
Subject: 
Re: More from REASON - A Nation of Liars (was Re: Supreme Court Rules Agains State Rights
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:54:03 GMT
Viewed: 
2464 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
   http://www.reason.com/links/links060805.shtml

Just for you, John:

“ Those who fret about morality in America, take note: Raich v. Gonzales codifies our status as a Nation of Liars.”

If you lie about marijuana use, yeah, you are a liar. What’s complicated about that?

The libertarian in me says legalize marijuana, prostitution, drugs etc, but then I have to look at what kind of society would be the result. From where I’m sitting, it doesn’t look good. People would be free, but our society would be a mess.

So yes, I do agree that government should, for the good of the society as a whole, limit some freedoms. Seat belts. Yeah, they cramp my style, but they save lives, reduce insurance costs, and so requiring them is a pretty good idea (except that they save the life of the idiot who would’ve removed himself from the gene pool without them, but you can’t have everything; where would you put it)

Prostitution. Not good, especially for women. And how far are we from virtual prostitution; from getting it on in the holodeck? Seems like a better idea to me then using women for sexual gratification. Lazy women who would merely offer their bodies for money will have to find another way to earn a buck.

Marijuana. Not really good, but if done in private, I see it no worse than smoking or drinking alcohol.

And so on. If people were generally honest, responsible and respectful, then I would say legalize everything. But people aren’t, and until society evolves to such a moral plateau, it won’t be ready to handle such freedoms.

JOHN



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: More from REASON - A Nation of Liars (was Re: Supreme Court Rules Agains State Rights
 
(...) Nothing. It's not a complicated point at all... we're governed by liars (Clinton "didn't inhale" and Bush "never did it"... right!... I beleive that!), surrounded by liars, are liars ourselves, and it's due to this stupid prohibition, just (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  More from REASON - A Nation of Liars (was Re: Supreme Court Rules Agains State Rights
 
(URL) for you, John: " Those who fret about morality in America, take note: Raich v. Gonzales codifies our status as a Nation of Liars." (19 years ago, 9-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

9 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR