Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 1961 – 1980 of about 12000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
(...) Janey "Red Brick" Why the heck you did that?.. Just heard the news from Gambort and shocked. Man, I was trying to connect to The Place every other day, still living in hope to see the day my connection problems are solved. Now I know this will (...) (17 years ago, 23-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.427)

		Re: Infinite Justice
(...) Well, I use it in exchange for words like "actually", which is supposed to be a usage problem. But what is one to do? That's the colloquial usage of the word... On a more serious note, is no one going to take issue with what I have proffered (...) (23 years ago, 20-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.427)

		Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
(...) We could form a committee to discuss it, and then all resign in a fit of petulance. That'd be fun. They could run the server from a handcranked laptop in Africa. It'd probably be more reliable than those shonky Northstar servers. (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.427)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) broken. (...) Not at all, see my response to Larry on this - you claimed to lack an appropriate flippant response - so I provided it. But I must say, that the original suggestion of sterilization made my skin crawl. (...) But on to the serious (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.427)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) Actually, it's an old law. And the guy didn't just utter the f-word a few times, he was all aggro-ed out, and shouting so people a fair distance away could hear him, and on and on. Personally, I don't care what language he was using. He (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.427)

		Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
-snip- (...) You mean no more never ending Robotic Cat thread??!! What the hell will I do with myself now??!! So I guess we'll all trudge over to BL chat now? ;-) (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.427)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
Christopher L. Weeks wrote in message <3784F884.EBFE1372@c...ri.edu>... (...) why do (...) Chris, I know we are on the same side and all, but following your moral further, it is also right to break the laws, as you see fit, because it hurts the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.427)

		Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
(...) No. No discussion. Why not register us, and see how it goes? Will it collapse in a mountain of anticommunitarian trolling? Will you collapse under the admin load? I suspect neither. But carpe diem and all that. You have built it, they are (...) (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.427)

		Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
It is a sad day today, I really enjoyed relaxing in Jlug, not needing to worry about watching what I or other would say. to be able to post irrelivant topics about nothing at all, or just smacking each other silly. for old times sake :wiz: :'( (...) (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.427)

		Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
(...) WOW, CL worker, you ARE a RATTC! the list of people who have registered is VERY impressive. Kudo's to you, and your new team. as a side note, and I am NOT a lawyer, but i think you might need permission from CL janey, and/or CL ross to use the (...) (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.427)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) I guess you mean a duplex. Sure, why not? Especially given the current state of the law that makes it so freakin difficult to get rid of losers once you find out they're scummy and you don't want them or their loud, dirty, possibly dangerous (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.427)

		JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Here are a few new JLUG slogans.... JLUG - The end of an error.... errr I mean era. JLUG - Been there, done that, cant be bothered to do it again. JLUG - The "sandbox" is condemned. Sadly during the recent crash we (JLUG) got hit pretty hard. Our (...) (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate) !!

all
(score: 0.427)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
<3784B28D.82177A5A@voyager.net> <FEK6nL.DDI@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Bully for you. Some public schools are better, some are worse. Point is that parents have no recourse when (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.427)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) That's amazing. When I taught - there were parent/teacher conferences every month in the evening and twice a year on Saturdays. But weren't there also PTA meetings in the evening? Couldn't you have made your complaint known at those meetings? (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.427)

		The big lie
From Forbes, which is much more libertarian than Fortune (which is why I subscribe to one and read the other on airplanes where it's free to me) (URL) I say I totally agree that we do not need changes in the Bill of Rights? Airport Security (...) (23 years ago, 17-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.427)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) In all fairness Communism is INdefensible from first principles, if you accept the rights based principle that people have the right to maximum freedom, or the utilitarian principle that we should strive for the system that produces the (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.427)

		Re: What is insurance? (was Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) The politicians they own cast votes on their behalf all the time - much more often than on the behalf of the people who elect them. (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.426)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) The 60s is the decade that invented the socially-acceptable slacker as far as I can tell. I get so sick of you people ranting insanely about how grand those times were. How exactly did you and yours fight for those things? Equal rights - I (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.426)

		Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
(...) All you do is give, Dave! (...) Oops! Mea culpa, but a rather funny blooper there, nonetheless:-) I'll bet you are only too happy to invite me into your little den of iniquity, Dave! :-) (...) I agree, and I think that fantasy provides a (...) (17 years ago, 7-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.426)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) I agree. I've actually thought a plan of universal reversible sterilization would do just fine, with some form of proof of worthiness to be un-sterilized. The worthiness part is the tricky part - I know I'm not qualified to make decisions like (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.426)

More: Next Page >>