|
| |
|  
all
(score: 0.488)
|
|
 | | Re: Keeping Larry Amused
|
| (...) Note carefully that there is no claim that the following is *practical* or a good idea. Merely that it is doable. In fact it is hugely impractical and a terrible idea. Lightning is a good thing, actually, despite the fact that sometimes it (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.487)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.486)
|
|
| | Re: An Alternative..
|
| Sorry Richard, this has been sitting in my draft folder... Richard Franks wrote in message ... (...) <snip> (...) country (...) agree, (...) almost (...) That depends on geography. The Federal government doesn't exert that much control here. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.486)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.486)
|
|
| | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| (...) Hey, no way! I left the country! It's on YOUR property. :-) Further, for the example, it is important that it happens on your property. Now if you can ever prove that your neighbor (...) Already addressed: You can't prove it. And it happened (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.486)
|
|
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.485)
|
|
| | Re: Corporate vs Individual liability
|
| James Brown wrote in message ... (...) is (...) Well, the owbers or stockholders are responsible also, though in many cases a stockholder's responsibility is less since he isn't directly running the company they way the CEO is. (...) refuses (...) (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.485)
|
|
| | Re: Corporate vs Individual liability
|
| James Brown wrote in message ... (...) find (...) the (...) can (...) and (...) but (...) employee's (...) if (...) The liability need only be assigned to the CEO if he is unable to make a satisfactory assignment. Also, in this case, I think all we (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.485)
|
|
| | Re: Corporate vs Individual liability
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes: (case study #1) (...) Corporation, yes. CEO? This is obviously where we are disagreeing. How can liability be assigned essentially at random to an individual? Why the CEO and not some other company (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.485)
|
|
| | Re: Who oversees the rec.toys.LEGO newsgroup?
|
| Ugh...too much work and not enough Lugnet makes Pete a dull boy. I'm actually enjoying this discussion so forgive me if it appears we're flogging a dead horse. (...) So to draw a longish bow do you believe we should expose kids to absolutely (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.484)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.484)
|
|
| | Re: Fixing the world (was Re: Ldraw cannon
|
| Larry Pieniazek wrote (...) But Larry, the good (selfish) view is that changing tags is fine because you benefit at the expense of people you don't know. Property rights work best when you can persuade others to adhere to them while you don't. (...) (26 years ago, 10-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 0.484)
|
|
| | Re: Fixing the world (was Re: Ldraw cannon
|
| <366C8C88.9640F50F@c...OSPAM.com> <slrn76qr20.1j0.cjc@...S.UTK.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Oh, but they are. There is a direct link between thinking that it's OK to ask/force someone else to (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 0.483)
|
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) Ah.. so after the second time they spill nuclear goo in a kiddies playground(1), things will change? Unless they've got a new CEO who does exactly what the old one did? My point is that having to wait for a company to violate rights a second (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.483)
|
|
| | Re: slight
|
| (...) And way too many people are following Dubya on, well, not exactly the same road, but a road of happily trampling the rights and freedoms of everyone. You and I are not going along willingly, but a whole bunch of folks are going along, not just (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.482)
|
|
| | Re: slight
|
| (...) You're thinking of the late 1920s... by 1939 the German people were pretty well off again with a fairly stable currency. Unfortunately that prosperity was built on theft via a military dictatorship that happily trampled the rights of everyone. (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.482)
|
|
| | Re: Who oversees the rec.toys.LEGO newsgroup?
|
| Wow, hasn't taken long for this hot potato to bounce out of the oven again. No sense in missing out on all the fun of the discussion, so here's my two minifigs worth (Star Wars, ofcourse!) (...) I'm with you there. Far too many arguments have got (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.482)
|
|
| | Re: An Alternative..
|
| Richard Franks wrote in message ... (...) vote (...) Except, I suppose, officials? (...) great (...) It was a comparison. I wasn't sure if we were ready for square one yet. We need to be sure we are on about the same wavelength. (...) everything (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.482)
|
|
| | Re: slight
|
| I thought we might agree on something fundamental from the way you were talking. Alas... (...) I agree. (...) It does have to do with the pleasure of the flesh and the pleasure of the spirit. I'm not twisting or making irrelevant points. And I think (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.482)
|
