 | | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!) —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | (...) Death to political discussion in .fun! Death to it! Death! Death! With nasty sharp pointy teeth! love and rockets, LFB FUT->.o-t.debate (actually, responding to what I wrote might qualify it for ".fun" again. Or ".monty-python"... (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!) —Scott Sanburn
|
| | | | | Bruce and all, ruce, I don't like off.topic.debate, I don't like talking about politics here, and I don't really pacticularlly care for you, for that matter. Anyway, (...) Look at his voting record, he is not conservative. It is not inaccurate, his (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | (...) No, you love to shoot off your mouth about politics (in inappropriate areas) but can't stand it when someone calls you on it. That you don't care for me simply because I pointed out an inaccuracy is par for the course for you. Anything you (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!) —James Simpson
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Bruce: This comment isn't specifically about you, and I mean nothing personal, but why not take the flame-fests off-line? These grudge-matches that flare up come across as really childish. james (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Did just that. Bruce (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Sanburn writes: <snip> My peeve with this thread is that some in it perpetuate the "right == Republican" and "left==Democrat" mythos. As you know, I feel the political spectrum is not one dimensional. Not hardly. (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | (...) My point exactly. (...) Absolutely. The differences are carefully selected, but this two-party tyranny has blandified elections. On too many issues I couldn't tell Cheney from Lieberman from Dubya from Gore. (...) Again, my point exactly. (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!) —James Powell
|
| | | | | | (...) "and who's going to be president, Tweedle Dumb or Tweedle Dumber" (Ani Difranco) Since I sit _far_ to the left, I don't much care for either one of the mainstream US parties (not though it really matters, since I am a Canadian, and have no (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!) —Dave Low
|
| | | | | | (...) Leaving aside the linear political analysis (see Larry's post here: (URL) and more below), one explanation of this phenomenon is quite interesting. Say there's a scale with 0 as far Left as possible in a system, and 100 as far Right. A Leftist (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!) —Scott Sanburn
|
| | | | | (...) Get stuffed! : ) (...) That's cool. A lot of rockets, aimed for..... Anyway, you can have fun with politics combined. I liked this site. (URL) ) A lot of people thought this funny, even moderates and Democrats that I know. Better. Scott S. -- (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) . Or ".monty-python"... Why didn't you post this after Scott's post? It was the usual Scott trick where he makes his political statement in the fun area, and only when he gets called on it does he get in his last word in the same area (so he (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!) —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) Because at that point only he and I were technically "involved," so I didn't feel things were out of control--merely misunderstood. Thus I answered with a bit more explanation, as it was my post to which he was responding. When your post came (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
