 | | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory —Tim Culberson
|
| | | (...) Actually it took me a day or two but I did happen to find a grip eventually: (URL) (...) I wish I had said that. (...) Where did you come up with this crazy ide that I'm out to control thoughts? I assure that was never my intent nor do I (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | (...) I think Larry has a problem with the truly "lost" people, mostly in the SouthEast US, who have decided they basically want the Bible taught in school in place of true scientifically based textbooks. Biblethumpers already pound the Bible into (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes: <snipped explanation of why I'm so vehement in my disdain for bunkum of the Literal Creationist sort... thanks!> (...) Me too, sort of... (well, if there *was* a bejeezus in me he's gone now) :-) What I (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Problems with Creationists' theory —Arnold Staniczek
|
| | | | I'll now go ahead and try to argue like Creationists do: Currently there are about 1.800.000.000 different species of living beings described. Do you seriously want to tell me that Noah had time enough to sample 1.100.000 insect species (wait a (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problems with Creationists' theory —Arnold Staniczek
|
| | | | | Sorry, (...) should of course read as: 1.800.000 different species ... (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problems with Creationists' theory —Tim Culberson
|
| | | | (...) I'm not quite sure what you mean by this - because this sure does sound like an evolutionist's argument to me. Certainly you have hit on a point where "practically" speaking a creationist can't argue against the monstrosity of the event you (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problems with Creationists' theory —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | (...) Hah! Like that matters! Do you want to even TRY to calculate the sheer volume of 2.2MILLION insects, especially since then would have to be housed separately to avoid some eating others? Want to try to figure out the food requirements for (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problems with Creationists' theory —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) "Riiighht. What's a cubit?" :) James (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problems with Creationists' theory —Tim Culberson
|
| | | | (...) Okay now I'm REALLY questioning the credability of these numbers. Please give me an authoritative source on this. First you (inclusive of "the evolutionists in this discussion") say "1.800.000.000 species", then you correct yourself and say (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problems with Creationists' theory —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | (...) I think you need to reread his original post: (...) Obvious typo, which he corrected, he added 3 too many zeros, he meant 1.8Million. But note the "different species OF LIVING BEINGS" (...) The LARGE majority of species on this planet are (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Problems with Creationists' theory —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | | (...) I was so busy at work that I forgot one of the more obvious grevious errors with your speaker. He seems to think that Noah only needed to gather land dwelling animals, that the water dwelling ones just swam around happily....PAP. Have you ever (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Problems with Creationists' theory —Tim Culberson
|
| | | | | | (...) I don't even knwo why I bother since I could cite every source ont he subject known that explains this but here's another one just for the record: (URL) to answer your fish question from the next message: (URL) Kent Hovind also explains this (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problems with Creationists' theory —Arnold Staniczek
|
| | | | (...) That's right. There are currently about 1.8 million species (plants and animals) described. Of course this is just an estimate - general textbooks vary in giving numbers from 1-2 million of DESCRIBED species, and estimates go even up to 8 (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
