To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8847
  Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
 
(...) This is not true, there are creationists that dispute it. SRC for example. (...) I don't think these mechanisms are at all similar, really. (although since the argument is made that we are actually colonies of cooperating organisms who happen (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
 
(...) Where? (23 years ago, 21-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
 
(...) My new thread does not have Darwinism in it's title - It is: Evolution - Impossible! I acknowledge that it's a bit general in the use of "Evolution" -Jon (23 years ago, 21-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
 
(...) Cosmology is the Big Bang theory which is the starting point of evolution. The abiogenesis is evolution. Certainly we can differ on terms, and probably do, but if it helps I'll refer to abiogenesis instead of 'evolution'. -Jon (23 years ago, 21-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
 
(...) Yes - I haven't looked too far, but can't find anyone who doesn't. (...) Actually I think that the fossile record shows no support for evolution at all and I rather surprised that you would hang your hat on such a discredited bit of evidence. (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
 
(...) Since it's pretty commonly accepted by most real scientists (not just the mass media, disdain for which I happen to share with you, but I digress), I'll let *you* discredit that fossils represent the remains of animals, that there are various (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
 
(...) I missed this point the first time. I dispute that this extraordinarily broad definition is "common usage". Common usage covers only points 3 and 4, below. It would be helpful if creationists were clear about what they feel is in dispute. (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
 
(...) all (...) evidence. (...) Done - Jon (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
 
(...) Now, I'm a bit confused - you've replied to my post without quoting any of my new material - what are you referring to ?? Is this "question" you're referring to in the above paragraph the question of abiogenesis (my 2.) or what??? (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
 
(...) The deeper quotes that I left (...) your 2. ++Lar (23 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
 
(...) Ok -Jon (23 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR