Subject:
|
Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Nov 2000 14:46:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
942 times
|
| |
|
|
<tim's text zapped>
Tim,
Larry could have ended this days ago if you had just answered my points.
He asked me to state them here, look down to "Sorry. Stipulate..":
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=7196
I did stipulate
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=7199
Larry failed to answer me, instead he cherry picked a point made by FF, and
then went of on some illogical quest to determine the area my doctorate
related to.
As for my conduct on LUGNET, you appear to be saying I'm a trouble maker in
here - with 95% of my posts being in this group. It may be the case that
over the last week or so I have placed most of my posts in this group,
before that it was a place I seldom ventured. Indeed, in one of Larry's
attacks on me, he claimed that all my posts were to the market groups.
If you, or Larry, don’t like me, I can live with that… just don’t expect me
to reciprocate. If you want to attack me personally, feel free – I’m pretty
thick skinned, but I won’t reciprocate. If you think my argument is wrong,
just say so… I can handle that. From:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=7476
=+=
2. Slave
> > Under libertarian principles, would one have the right sell oneself into
> > slavery?
>
> I'm not sure where the LP comes down on this, but I'll take a shot at it.
> If certain rights, such as liberty, cannot be forfeit, then slavery cannot
> be entered into, even voluntarily.
Fair point.
=+=
However, if you want to say I’m wrong on an issues, give me the ability to
question you also.
If you don’t think Larry and I should talk, that would suite me fine. I’m
happier talking over the issues than I am froth:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=7487
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=7507
Scott A
<tim's text zapped>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
| "Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:G4qp1v.87r@lugnet.com... (...) I don't think its that simple, but suit yourself :-) BTW - I'll assume that the 'you' there is a typo, where 'he' should have been there. (...) in (...) Second I (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G4qF2F.EyC@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) should (...) Lar- I'm pretty much in agreement with what you said in your post. And sometimes I dunno why I keep skimming o-t.debate. :o) So (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
