| |
"Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message
news:G4p452.23y@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > 4 Quick Questions:
>
> I'm hardly Libertarian, but I think I can field a few of these:
>
> > 1. Race
> > Under libertarian principles, would one have the right discriminate • against
> > others based on race?
>
> Sure, as one is able to discriminate now, based on race. Not currently • in
> terms of employment or pay, but the right to associate or not to associate
> is spelled out very clearly in the Constitution. In Libertopia, I think,
> one would be free to employ based on ability, which, one hopes, would
> transcend issues of race or gender. (Remember, at present, this is a
> hypothetical realm, but the theory is useful.) In any case, why should • one
> be forced to employ someone of lesser qualifications, regardless of race • or
> gender? I know employment isn't the only manifestation of racial
> discrimination, but it's a solid, tangible illustration.
Fair points. But could, say, a school operate on a "no blacks" basis?
>
> > 2. Slave
> > Under libertarian principles, would one have the right sell oneself into
> > slavery?
>
> I'm not sure where the LP comes down on this, but I'll take a shot at • it.
> If certain rights, such as liberty, cannot be forfeit, then slavery cannot
> be entered into, even voluntarily.
Fair point.
> One could, I'd imagine, sell one's
> exclusive services to a bidder, much as is done today through contract • work.
> Slavery turns an individual into property, and property has no rights.
>
> > 3. Regulation
> > Would medical doctors etc be regulated to ensure their competence? Or • could
> > one just buy a medical degree from a University, and open a practice?
>
> My understanding of Libertarian principles, as spelled out in OT.Debate,
> includes full and honest disclosure. As such, you might be free to buy
> whatever degree you care to buy, but you must reveal that you have no
> training to back up that degree. In any case, you would be held liable
After, say, a death? I prefer prevention, to cure.
Scott A
> as a
> dubiously-licensed MD (or whatever), and soon after your first botched
> procedure you'd be out of business. If you stayed in business, however,
> you'd need to disclose your previous botches, which certainly wouldn't • help
> future business.
>
> > 4. Game Shows
> > Would TV companies be able to air "The Running Man" type shows where
> > volunteer contestants fight each other to death?
>
> Not quite sure how to articulate my answer to this one, and I'm of two
> minds anyway. I'll get back to you...
>
> Dave!
>
> PS: My apologies to any actual Libertarians if I've grossly misrepresented
> the LP's views here!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LP POINT 3
|
| (...) I'm hardly Libertarian, but I think I can field a few of these: (...) Sure, as one is able to discriminate now, based on race. Not currently in terms of employment or pay, but the right to associate or not to associate is spelled out very (...) (26 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
