To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6506
6505  |  6507
Subject: 
Re: Nuke Boston (was Re: Resolved: Tall SUVs should not be...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 20:51:17 GMT
Viewed: 
487 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:

Why, if these are good ideas, is it necessary for there to be regulation?

I know this idea rankles your Libertarian side, Lar, but easily 80% of the US
needs "good ideas" to be regulated for them, because they wouldn't understand
consensual logic and working together if it bit them on the apricots.

Whether or not this is the result of overlegislation is a debate for another
time (although my answer would be not really).

eric



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Nuke Boston (was Re: Resolved: Tall SUVs should not be...)
 
(...) Agreed. (...) But lastworditis forces me to say that I feel it is indeed (the effect of too much regulation, too much government promising to make it right and too much big daddyism). :-) ++Lar (24 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Nuke Boston (was Re: Resolved: Tall SUVs should not be...)
 
(...) Sorry, that Canadian education must have been letting you down: (URL) #3 sense 1: Made before or without examination) (...) Really? I wasn't aware that government was responsible for making the world safe. I don't see it in OUR constitution (...) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)

26 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR