Subject:
|
Re: Million Mom March
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 13 May 2000 16:37:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
347 times
|
| |
|
|
> > - no way are you the most radical pro second amendment guy here, sorry. I
> > draw
> > the line at tactical nukes. Anything a modern army can have that can be • carried
> > by one person is fair game for private ownership. THAT'S the intent of the
> > second amendment. Thomas Jefferson told me so last nite.
> >
> > ++Lar
100 percent aggreed
>
> Preach on, Brother Larry! While I don't think that we need to be packing
> around assault rifles, I agree with everything else you say. They say guns
> kill people? Please. I've never seen a gun, even a loaded one, just jump up
> off of a table, aim, and shoot someone. Some idiot has to be standing behind
> it in order to pull that thing called a trigger. So, what do we do? Who do
> we blame? Oh, it's not the idiot's fault, noooo. That naughty gun shouldn't
> do that. I personally enjoy hunting, and own 6 guns. I know I've only got
> two hands, but I like guns. They're very recreational and lots of fun when
> used properly. I say gun control laws are just a bunch of cow flop. If
> congress, the prez, and whoever else wants to make the world a safer place,
> why not just shoot these retards who kill people in cold blood. It says in
> the Bible "An eye for an eye." And, if you're not Christian, well, and eye
> for an eye still sounds good. These idiots give up their rights the minute
> they take another human's life. That's a big fat two cents to stick in this.
> -Chris
Exactly.
Did you guys know Sarah Brady fonder of Handgun Control Inc. was qouted some
years ago as saying, "Socialist America can not be realized until those who
would oppose us have been totally disarmed."
Everyone knows criminals don't follow laws. Adding another will never work.
Gun Control has nothing to do with criminals and anyone that believes it does
is extremly ignorant. Should gun control ever be enacted only criminals (and
those like myself who would march against Washington) would have guns. The US
government is trying to enact Gun Control so slowly that the public in general
doesn't relize it. The US Gun Control Act of 1968 is virtually word for word
identical to the translated Nazi Wepons Law of 1938. Hittler used criminals as
his scapegoat to acomplish his goals. Well we all know what happened in
Germany. What is the US building up to?
-Lord Insanity
"Occasionaly the blood of patriots and tyrants alike, must be spilled to keep
the republic pure." -Thomas Jefferson
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Million Mom March
|
| (...) Wow. (...) Well, I don't think that it's that simple. For instance the MMM's main goal is to have universal registration federally organized. I think it is pretty clearly (mostly) possible to maintain a registry of weapons entering the nation (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Million Mom March
|
| (...) Ignoring for a moment that this is the classic falacy of "slippery slope" reasoning, as well as the spectre of "nazi=forfeited argument," you've made a few compelling points. By the way, can you cite a web-reference for that translated Nazi (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Million Mom March
|
| (...) for (...) people (...) carried (...) Preach on, Brother Larry! While I don't think that we need to be packing around assault rifles, I agree with everything else you say. They say guns kill people? Please. I've never seen a gun, even a loaded (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
