 | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) Wow, hey, does this mean that there is some confusion or ambiguity as to whether or not Adam actually did die? Or is it known beyond the shadow of a doubt that he did actually _for sure_ die? Assuming it's not known absolutely for sure, have (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Ben Roller
|
| | | | | (...) As cool as that would be (and you could just say it was a misprint, or that he was faking it or some other excuse to make that type of story), it is "known"(1) that he died. Eve on the other hand is not mentioned after Cain and Abel are born. (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | (...) Cain is said to have never died, being cursed to walk this world forever lest he enter the next. But I could just be remembering a terrible mini-series, I dunno... Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) stories (...) could (...) That is indeed in Genesis. It's been the source of any number of cheezy things, including much of White Wolf's back story for their Vampire:The Masquerade RPG. It also talks about Cain, after being sent away for (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | (...) Wasn't Lillith mentioned in some other religious text, perhaps Babylonian or Phoenecian? Evidently, Adam's first wife was Lillith, who left due to interpersonal incompatabilities. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Markus Wolf
|
| | | | | | | (...) the (...) Neat (...) YOu know, I don't like the idea of future generations getting their theology from role playing games. Markus (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | (...) ...? Which role playing games? I'm sure the game company lawyers would *love* to argue that they had the idea first, but Lilith is a valid character from several ancient religious texts. I found the reference: Lilith is mentioned early on in (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Markus Wolf
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) or (...) Okay, well that obviously isn't in the Royal Book. And it doesn't really make sense. Here, in the perfect Garden of Eden, where there's no sin, except for a serpent. I honestly know nothing of Lilith. It's not a good policy to drag in (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) to (...) Oh. I never said I believed in the story. I was just throwing in some extra comment to bounce around. No, I believe that Adam's first real family problems started with his children. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) FTR, I'm the one who mentioned the RPG. As an aside, that had nothing to do with my point, and certainly not as a source. If I wasn't so impervious, I'd be insulted that someone thought I was dim enough to do that. James (URL) catching up on (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Markus Wolf
|
| | | | | | | | (...) or (...) Oooh, one more thing. I found in Psalm 93 where it says that God is clothed with majesty and strength. I know it's in a poetic format, but I betcha if you could see God, there'd be so much beauty and light surrounding Him (like Isaiah (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | | (...) I don't know if it was mentioned in RELIGIOUS texts, but C.S. Lewis mentioned it in "The Lion, the witch & the wardrobe", which is definitely christianity- influenced... (Not to mention it's like a bible to me :) I love Narnia!) -Shiri (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Narnia or some kind of Jewish folktale —Erik Olson
|
| | | | | | Warning: this message is on-topic. (...) I think it is a safe guess that one of Jack's models for Narnia was the fantasy novel _Lilith_ by George MacDonald. It too is remotely based on that Jewish folktale about Adam's other wife. I forget which (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Narnia or some kind of Jewish folktale —Erik Olson
|
| | | | | | Warning: this message is on-topic. Bull-beggars? Heh heh. I quote more: "Reginald Scot mentions fairies (and nymphs) among bugbears used to frighten children: 'Our mothers' maids have so terrified us with bull-beggars*, spirits, witches, urchins, (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Bill Farkas
|
| | | | (...) It never says "forever". It just says he'll be a fugitive and a vagabond (...James VagaBond) sorry. Also, it doesn't say there were only four people at this point. It says she gave birth to them two and then it says, "in the process of time" (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | (...) Yep. Not only that, but he'll bear a mark on his forehead, the curse mark. (...) Actually, there are many other theories that say that even though Adam and Eve were the first couple, they weren't the only one. That God had later created other (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Ben Roller
|
| | | | | (...) That's, IMO, just to explain it so that there was no incest. I don't see why it couldn't be true though (as it is not mentioned either way in the Bible). As far as I'm concerned, if it's not mentioned, it didn't neccessarily happen or (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | (...) Eve (...) I don't think incest would have necessarily been an issue then, from a medical standpoint anyway. With a relatively "pure" gene pool, for example from 1st to 5th generations since Creation, incestual couplings would produce far fewer (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Bill Farkas
|
| | | | | (...) brought (...) Abel (...) find (...) That was the point above about the 130 years, enough people could have existed at that point to have migrated to Nod and settled. 130 years is a long time. It's 135 years back to the civil war, to put that (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | (canceled) —Bill Farkas
|
| | | | |
