Subject:
|
Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 5 Mar 2000 03:32:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1351 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Markus Wolf writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
> > Markus Wolf wrote:
> > > YOu know, I don't like the idea of future generations getting their
> > > theology from role playing games.
> > ...? Which role playing games? I'm sure the game company lawyers would
> > *love* to argue that they had the idea first, but Lilith is a valid character
> > from several ancient religious texts.
> I know you didn't refer to the RPG. Someone else had. I was responding to
> that. But my point is that it's dangerous to use extra-biblical sources,
> especially from anti-biblical religions to develop your beliefs.
FTR, I'm the one who mentioned the RPG. As an aside, that had nothing to do
with my point, and certainly not as a source. If I wasn't so impervious, I'd
be insulted that someone thought I was dim enough to do that.
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego
(just catching up on several hundred msgs)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
| (...) or (...) Okay, well that obviously isn't in the Royal Book. And it doesn't really make sense. Here, in the perfect Garden of Eden, where there's no sin, except for a serpent. I honestly know nothing of Lilith. It's not a good policy to drag in (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
541 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
