 | | Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus —Timothy Gould
|
| | | (...) I'd rather not know than get my answers from a pulp paperback from 2000 years ago ;) (...) I think you'll find you're quite mistaken there. I know plenty of scientists who are Christian and I've never noticed their views to be taken better or (...) (18 years ago, 24-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus —John Neal
|
| | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote: <snip> (...) That may be. I seem to remember reading something about the topic; perhaps I can do some digging around. (...) Yeah, I meant to address this elsewhere and forgot: I'm not talking about (...) (18 years ago, 24-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Tim, (URL) this> touches on what I was talking about. JOHN (18 years ago, 24-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Well, that's pretty unfair. That's like saying we NEED an answer, and if we can't come up with one, creationism is correct. If you go back to 500 BC and asked people why lightning happened, I'm sure they could come up with answers. But just (...) (18 years ago, 24-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton wrote: --snip-- (...) --snip-- (...) I believe that many predictions of the Big Bang theory have been verified which is why I say there is an overwhelming body of evidence for it. There is admittedly far more (...) (18 years ago, 24-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, I'm trying to be strictly accurate there. It's not that the evidence proves the conclusion, it's that the evidence doesn't contradict the conclusion. If we had (for example) two conflicting ideas about the origin of the universe (the Big (...) (18 years ago, 24-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | | (...) I have avoided using the word "proved" for that very good reason. (...) However in the absence of the alternate theory then the evidence supports the one theory. Which is why the Big Bang Theory is now commonly named as such whereas it used to (...) (18 years ago, 24-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Now that's unfair:-) I am NOT arguing for creationism. Science is about explaining things. All I'm saying is that what happened pre Big Bang is inexplicable. (...) Agreed. (...) Thank you. That is entirely my point. Therefore any explanation (...) (18 years ago, 24-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus —David Eaton
|
| | | | | (...) I'm not sure that it will be forever outside the scope of science. The more we learn, the more we discover. Take Brendan's sealed-closet example. And let's suppose we can walk around the closet. Well, we know whatever's in the closet has to (...) (18 years ago, 24-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus —Thomas Stangl
|
| | | | (...) Actually, it didn't really happen in a point in time, AFAIAC. Time began at that point. In fact, there's a good chance that "time" didn't "begin" (or stabilize) for "eons" (read in femto- or pico- seconds), just as our physics framework (as we (...) (18 years ago, 25-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
