Subject:
|
Re: Newdow in the News (again)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Jun 2006 20:35:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2033 times
|
| |
|
|
"Judge Frank Damrell of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of California held in his opinion that "In God We Trust" is secular in
nature and use, and its appearance on coins and currency does not show
government coercion on behalf of monotheism."
I wonder if he was able to complete that opinion with a straight face?
Secular? What a CROCK.
Note - I agree that the phrase should go. Secular it AIN'T. Twist your
"logic" any way you want, but it's not secular, it's religious, and it's
holding up one religion (monotheism) over another (polytheism, atheism).
John wrote:
> Little rules I live by... #13
>
> 13. "If you can't even get the {9th circuit} to go along with your
> <http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/oukoe_uk_life_atheist_lawsuit kooky agenda>, then
> you are {really} kooky."
>
> Oh where is the cacaphony of criticism from the Creedless? :-)
>
> [JOHN]
--
Tom Stangl
* http://www.vfaq.com/
* DSM Visual FAQ home
* 90 Talon AWD
* http://www.vfaq.net/
* Prius Visual FAQ Home
* 04 Prius AM #7
* 06 Prius NL #7
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Newdow in the News (again)
|
| (...) I really wish that when terms related to religion (esp. "god") are used, that the standard the courts used was not "oh, that term is secular" but "if a someone is claiming the term is religious and serves to establish religion that the (...) (18 years ago, 14-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Newdow in the News (again)
|
| (...) It is acknowledging the religious history of this country without necessarily endorsing it. We are a nation of religious people. So what? It's not forcing you to do anything or believe anything. If there is no force or coercion behind the (...) (18 years ago, 16-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Newdow in the News (again)
|
| Little rules I live by... #13 13. "If you can't even get the 9th circuit to go along with your (URL) kooky agenda>, then you are really kooky." Oh where is the cacaphony of criticism from the Creedless? :-) JOHN (18 years ago, 13-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
