 | | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!! —Timothy Gould
|
| | | --SNIP-- (...) ???? (...) Disagree. One hundred people is a decent amount (error is proportional to 1/sqrt(sample size)). Besides, if the sample size was considered inadequate in a statistical sense by the experts in the field who review the paper (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) That's an inside joke between Mr. Neal and me. Nothing to do, incidentally, with discussions of the UN Embassy in Denmark, which we have all "let go." (...) I don't know about that last part, but a sample of 2,000 kids growing up in a famously (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!! —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) See Sore Thumbs (the webcomic) lately. I'd give you a link but not from behind this firewall... (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!! —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Sorry. That was an inside reference to Dave! I was referring to the (URL) Democratic Underground>. (...) You could have a sample size of 1,000,000, but if it isn't random, then it is worthless. Berkeley is arguabley the most liberal place in (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) But if you go there, don't tell them that you know John, or you'll be summarily booted. Dave! (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!! —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) It's okay. The people there don't know Jack>:-) JOHN (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!! —Thomas Stangl
|
| | | | Honest question - which is more ridiculous? 1 - pro-life and pro-death-penalty 2 - pro-choice and anti-death-penalty I don't know, but I see far too many conservatives that fit #1, which makes little sense. And of course I see a decent amount of (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!! —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Okay, Tom, let me take a stab at justifying a position such as this one. A pro-life stance would hold that a human life above all is sacred. So, the ultimate crime would be the taking of an innocent life. Therefore, the ultimate punishment (...) (19 years ago, 23-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) All that "ultimate punishment" talk is, alas, straight from the George W. Bush buzzword lexicon. In typical Dubya fashion, it enables him to sound tough without actually taking a definitive stand. Since I know you to be a person of conviction (...) (19 years ago, 23-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | The Ultimate Discussion (was: Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!) —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Now, now, settle down, Dave! I'm pretty sure that the word "ultimate" pre-existed some apocryphal, presidential playbook and no association with OFL whatsoever was intended. (...) Let's see. (...) See? You got it on the first try! :-) (...) (...) (19 years ago, 23-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Ultimate Discussion (was: Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) Ahhh, but see is unrestrained murder of thousands of your subjects "more ultimate" than the murder of the guy that breaks into your house? If so, how can murder be the "ultimate crime"? If not, why do they carry different sentences? (...) (...) (19 years ago, 23-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
