 | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Richard Franks
|
| | | (...) A lack of evidence is not evidence in itself. One piece of evidence that we do have is that they would sack an employee for doing what we have done. Doesn't that suggest that "it does matter" to you? Why should TLC dignify this with a (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | Believe it or not, I'm taking the side of TLC here, and you guys aren't. At least in one way. "You guys" are basically assuming TLC is a bunch of clueless morons that haven't seen the furor over this, or have seen it, and are too clueless to know (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | (...) Or they don't care. Which is what I think. And I'm more than willing to interpret silence that way, just like we've interpreted their silence on other issues that way. (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) It sort-of is. (...) We have no such evidence. (...) It's not obvious to me. (...) here you seem to be asserting that TLG has actually fired employees for this. Who? When? What are you talking about? I agree with Mike three notes down. Chris (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Richard Franks
|
| | | | (...) In some very defined circumstances, it is suspicious - "The company accounts are missing" etc. But that wouldn't be evidence that the company had been up to fraudulent behaviour. This "evidence" is of the sort: "Mummy hasn't told me not to (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | Richard Franks <spontificus@__nospa...yahoo.com> wrote in message news:FMG645.9Ct@lugnet.com... (...) in (...) Oh, Please...No more stretches OK? It's not that sort of evidence, even there is not just a bit of similarity. If your brother would have (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Richard Franks
|
| | | | (...) Agreed, so we're still waiting for the first slap? It probably isn't a perfect analogy, it wasn't meant to be - the original point was that silence isn't always evidence. (...) Agreed, I don't think what Huw did was more wrong than that. What (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Lawrence Wilkes
|
| | | | (...) In lugnet.technic, Michael Edwards writes: (...) Looks like someone got the first slap! regards lawrence (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
