To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 2758
2757  |  2759
Subject: 
Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 9 Dec 1999 17:04:38 GMT
Viewed: 
3328 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Franks writes:

> 
> Agreed, so we're still waiting for the first slap? It probably isn't a perfect
> analogy, it wasn't meant to be - the original point was that silence isn't
> always evidence.


In lugnet.technic, Michael Edwards writes:
> Hello All
> 
> I have now removed must of the 2000 Technic Images just to be on the safe
> side
> As i had a phone call from Lego Legal Dept (i wasn't their at the time of
> the call). They are really annoyed to the fact that serect images were
> released. I will find out tomorrow the full story on the phone call, so i
> will let you guys know on the full story on this issue.
> 
> --
> Michael

Looks like someone got the first slap!

regards
lawrence



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
 
(...) Agreed, so we're still waiting for the first slap? It probably isn't a perfect analogy, it wasn't meant to be - the original point was that silence isn't always evidence. (...) Agreed, I don't think what Huw did was more wrong than that. What (...) (27 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)

116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR