To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 2722
2721  |  2723
Subject: 
Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general
Date: 
Wed, 8 Dec 1999 21:25:34 GMT
Viewed: 
1897 times
  
Richard Franks wrote:

A lack of evidence is not evidence in itself.

It sort-of is.

One piece of evidence that we do have is that they would sack an employee for
doing what we have done. Doesn't that suggest that "it does matter" to you?

We have no such evidence.

Why should TLC dignify this with a response? Obviously they don't wish
retailer catalogues to be shown to customers, we know that. What is there to
discuss??

It's not obvious to me.

What do you expect TLC to say on the matter. "Go ahead, we never really cared
anyway, we just went to all the trouble of making these secret and sacking
employees who make them publically available for the fun of it."?

here you seem to be asserting that TLG has actually fired employees for
this.  Who?  When?  What are you talking about?

I agree with Mike three notes down.

Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
 
(...) In some very defined circumstances, it is suspicious - "The company accounts are missing" etc. But that wouldn't be evidence that the company had been up to fraudulent behaviour. This "evidence" is of the sort: "Mummy hasn't told me not to (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
 
(...) A lack of evidence is not evidence in itself. One piece of evidence that we do have is that they would sack an employee for doing what we have done. Doesn't that suggest that "it does matter" to you? Why should TLC dignify this with a (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)

116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR