| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> Actually, NO, with the available evidence (i.e. NOTHING said from TLC so
> far), it is correct, not wishful thinking. If I would have seen ONE message
> in here or on lego.com asking that the pics be removed from sites, then I
> would agree with you that the evidence leans toward "it does matter". All I
> see is arguments FROM AFOLs, not one word from TLC.
>
> Don't even try to say they haven't noticed it yet, or have been formulating an
> answer for DAYS. If you think that, you need to stop daydreaming so much ;-)
A lack of evidence is not evidence in itself.
One piece of evidence that we do have is that they would sack an employee for
doing what we have done. Doesn't that suggest that "it does matter" to you?
Why should TLC dignify this with a response? Obviously they don't wish
retailer catalogues to be shown to customers, we know that. What is there to
discuss??
What do you expect TLC to say on the matter. "Go ahead, we never really cared
anyway, we just went to all the trouble of making these secret and sacking
employees who make them publically available for the fun of it."?
I stand by my comment below! :)
Richard
> Richard Franks wrote:
>
> > This "They probably don't care, and it doesn't matter", may be true - but
> > with the available evidence it is rationalisation, wishful thinking.
> >
> > Richard
>
> --
> Tom Stangl
> ***http://www.vfaq.com/
> ***DSM Visual FAQ home
> ***http://ba.dsm.org/
> ***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
